Skip to main content

Security report for aptos.com

Aptos, LLC · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Aptos, LLC operates a professional and comprehensive website focused on providing unified commerce solutions to retail businesses globally. The company positions itself as a leader in retail technology, offering a broad suite of services including point of sale, order management, merchandising, analytics, and cloud services. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with extensive client testimonials, major retail brand partnerships, and a strong marketing infrastructure. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Marketo, Algolia, and Adobe Experience Platform. The site is well-optimized for mobile and accessibility, with good SEO practices and a professional design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protections, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. The WHOIS data is notably absent, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. Despite this, the website's professional content, trust signals, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies indicate a legitimate and trustworthy business. However, the lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts suggest areas for improvement. Overall, the website scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and security posture, with minor penalties for missing WHOIS data and security policy transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aptos.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Aptos operates in the retail technology sector, targeting medium to large retail enterprises seeking unified commerce solutions. Their business model is B2B, providing software and services that unify omnichannel retail operations. The company leverages strong partnerships with major retail brands, enhancing its market position as a leader in retail unified commerce. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, cloud services, hardware sales, and professional services such as implementation and support. The presence of extensive marketing and analytics tools indicates a focus on customer acquisition and retention. Growth indicators include recent press releases and client testimonials from well-known retailers. The company maintains a consistent brand image and a comprehensive digital presence, supporting its competitive advantage in the retail technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information is a compliance gap that could affect incident handling and user trust. GDPR compliance is indicated through privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and marketing tools to mitigate supply chain and privacy risks.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aptos, LLC
Description
Unify your omnichannel experience and enterprise with Aptos Retail's leading commerce solutions. The world's top retailers trust Aptos ONE, POS, Merchandising and more.
Key services
Unified Commerce Solutions, Point of Sale (POS), Order Management, Merchandising, Sales Audit, Customer Relationship Management, Store Fulfillment, Analytics, Hardware Sales and Services, Implementation Services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Marketo Munchkin, jQuery, Algolia Search, InstantSearch.js, jQuery UI, Adobe Experience Platform, Autopilot SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens present in meta tags
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Marketo Munchkin, Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Marketo, Google Tag Manager, 6sense
Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Marketo, Autopilot, Adobe Experience Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on retail unified commerce solutions with multiple product offerings.
  3. Presence of multiple client testimonials and major retail brand logos.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools indicating mature digital marketing.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response contact information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Algolia search, Marketo marketing automation, Google Tag Manager, and Adobe Experience Platform. It is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable digital presence, though opportunities exist to improve security headers and reduce reliance on multiple third-party scripts to minimize risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aptos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aptos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.