Skip to main content

Security report for apsj.paris

Autonomie Paris Saint Jacques · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Autonomie Paris Saint Jacques (APSJ) is a non-profit association operating as a resource center focused on issues related to aging and autonomy in the central arrondissements of Paris (1st to 6th). The organization supports elderly individuals, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals by providing evaluation services, orientation, training, and innovative local projects to combat isolation and improve care. APSJ is well-positioned locally with partnerships including regional health agencies and retirement insurance bodies. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins and accessibility features, offering clear navigation and comprehensive content relevant to its audience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, domain transfer protections, and reCAPTCHA usage, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are absent. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, indicating GDPR compliance. Contact information is transparent and includes multiple channels. Overall, APSJ demonstrates a professional and trustworthy online presence aligned with its mission and audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apsj.paris

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

APSJ occupies a niche in the non-profit sector focused on elderly care and support within Paris. Its competitive advantage lies in localized expertise, multidisciplinary professional teams, and strong partnerships with public health and social service entities. The business model centers on service provision funded by public and private partners, with additional revenue from training programs. Target customers include elderly persons with autonomy loss, their caregivers, and professionals in home care. Growth indicators include ongoing innovative projects and training offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes regional health agencies, retirement insurance, and municipal authorities, enhancing credibility and resource access. The website supports these operations with clear messaging and resource links.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration includes transfer and deletion prohibitions, reducing risk of hijacking. Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms mitigates automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms align with privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No public security policy or incident response contacts are provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the organization's risk profile but could be improved with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Autonomie Paris Saint Jacques
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Autonomie Paris Saint Jacques
Description
APSJ est un lieu ressource relatif aux questions liées à l'avancée en âge. Nous accompagnons les aînées, leurs proches aidants ainsi que les professionnels.
Key services
Evaluation of needs for elderly persons, Support and orientation for elderly and caregivers, Training for home intervention professionals, Innovative local projects for isolation and aid
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Modern Events Calendar Lite, Contact Form 7, Simple Google reCAPTCHA, Cookie Law Info, WP Accessibility, OceanWP theme, jQuery, FontAwesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out

Analytics and tracking

Services
Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
All in One SEO, Cookie Law Info
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit resource center for elderly and caregivers in Paris.
  2. Clear and consistent branding with official partner logos.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and themes with accessibility features.
  6. Contact information is transparent and easily accessible.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the OceanWP theme and Elementor page builder, supplemented by plugins such as Modern Events Calendar Lite, Contact Form 7, Simple Google reCAPTCHA, and Cookie Law Info. The hosting provider is OVH, a reputable European host. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features enabled. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumbs. The site uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and enable DNSSEC for enhanced resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apsj.paris. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apsj.paris.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.