Skip to main content

Security report for apsara.lv

APSARA TĒJU FABRIKA · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apsara Tea is a small Latvian retail company specializing in a variety of tea products including tea bags, loose tea, exclusive blends, and organic options. They also offer private label services, targeting general consumers and businesses interested in branded tea products. The website presents a consistent brand image with a focus on product assortment and social media engagement. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome icons, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification, and no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy, security, and content depth to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apsara.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector with a niche focus on tea products, leveraging private label manufacturing as a business model. Their market positioning is that of a quality-focused tea brand with a diverse product range. The website's social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Foursquare supports brand visibility and customer engagement. The lack of detailed business registration or certification information on the site limits transparency. No analytics or advanced marketing tools were detected, indicating a potentially low level of digital marketing sophistication. The company appears to target both end consumers and business clients for private label services, suggesting a mixed B2C and B2B approach. Growth indicators and partnerships are not evident from the website content.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent banner that allows users to control cookie preferences, indicating some attention to privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The lack of privacy policy and terms of service pages is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data handling and GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection.
  3. Provide terms of service and incident response contact information to improve transparency and compliance.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
APSARA TĒJU FABRIKA
Description
Apsara Tea is a company specializing in tea products including tea bags, loose tea, exclusive tea, and organic (BIO) tea. They offer private label services and provide information on where to buy their products.
Key services
Tea bags, Loose tea, Exclusive tea, Organic tea, Private label services
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular options

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present with options for required, preferences, statistics, and marketing cookies.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected.
  5. Contact email found in header: BARGI@BARGI.LV
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  7. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Foursquare present.
  8. Website uses HTTPS and external resources from Google Fonts and MaxCDN.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  10. No forms detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard tech stack with JavaScript, CSS, Google Fonts, and Font Awesome icons. It loads external resources from trusted CDNs such as fonts.googleapis.com and maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The site is mobile optimized with responsive navigation menus and a cookie consent banner. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements or errors. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. The site lacks advanced frameworks or analytics tools, indicating a relatively simple technical infrastructure. There is room for modernization and improvement in SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apsara.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apsara.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.