Skip to main content

Security report for aprangagroup.lt

Apranga Group · Retail · Lithuania

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apranga Group is a leading retail clothing company operating primarily in the Baltic states, collaborating with well-known European and global brands. The company has established a strong market position since its domain registration in 2014, indicating a mature business presence. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure, utilizing JavaScript frameworks, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally sound with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policy pages suggests room for improvement in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the website is professional and functional, but enhancing privacy compliance and security best practices would strengthen trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aprangagroup.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Apranga Group operates in the retail sector, focusing on clothing sales across the Baltic region. The business model centers on retail partnerships with prominent brands, targeting consumers interested in fashion and apparel. The company benefits from a consistent brand presentation and a well-structured website that supports its market leadership. While direct contact information is not readily available on the site, the domain registration data aligns with the company's Lithuanian base, supporting legitimacy. The use of Cloudflare DNS and Google Analytics indicates integration with reliable service providers. Growth potential is supported by the company's established market position and digital presence, though transparency in privacy and security policies could be enhanced to meet evolving regulatory standards.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and employs a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The absence of a privacy policy and contact channels for security incidents represents compliance gaps, especially under GDPR and related frameworks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Strengthening security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing incident response contacts are recommended to elevate security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, ideally via a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Apranga Group
Description
„Aprangos“ grupė – mažmeninės prekybos drabužiais lyderė Baltijos šalyse, bendradarbiaujanti su garsiausiais prekių ženklais Europoje ir pasaulyje.
Key services
Retail clothing sales, Brand partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with high confidence.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and Google Analytics indicates a mature technical setup.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the provided data; recommend adding for enhanced security.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks, likely Vue.js, as indicated by scoped style attributes and floating-vue classes. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and cookie management, respectively. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, enhancing performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses Montserrat font family for consistent branding. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is good, with meta description and robots tags properly set. The absence of a CMS indication suggests a custom or framework-based site. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aprangagroup.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aprangagroup.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.