Skip to main content

Security report for approxima.com

Approxima a/s · Information technology and services · Denmark

Partial score · DNS & email only

48/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
3of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching approxima.com

This scan found 9 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Security headers
60
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Approxima positions itself as a specialist SAP implementation partner with a strong client base including ATP, Ørsted, and Energinet.dk. Their business model centers on consulting and project delivery in SAP environments, with services spanning implementation, project management, testing, and training. The company targets medium to large enterprises in Denmark, particularly in regulated sectors like energy and transportation. The website content is professional and consistent, supporting their market positioning. However, the lack of publicly available company registration or WHOIS data may affect credibility with new clients.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or security contact information is provided. The use of third-party tracking (Leadinfo) is detected without clear consent mechanisms. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in compliance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce comprehensive security headers to protect against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Add explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer details.
  5. Conduct a security audit of third-party scripts and tracking services to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Approxima
Description
Approxima har fokus på at sikre du får viden ud af dine data. Vores spidskompetencer er indenfor SAP systemer, de tilhørende processer og data er afsæt til at skabe værdifuld rapportering. Vi ser rapportering som en naturlig del af alle vores leverancer.
Key services
SAP S/4HANA implementation, SAP ERP services, Project management, Solution architecture, Test management, Go-live support, Training, Business Intelligence & Analytics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Lottie animations, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Webflow framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Leadinfo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Leadinfo
Marketing tools
Leadinfo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Danish and targets SAP implementation services
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  4. Use of modern web technologies and animations enhances user experience
  5. No visible security headers or explicit security policies
  6. WHOIS data missing, indicating potential domain registration or privacy issues
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with approxima.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review approxima.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.