Skip to main content

Security report for appealtrack.com

CSC AppealTrack® · Real Estate · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CSC AppealTrack is a specialized real estate appeal management software platform designed to assist teams in assessing property appeal strength, managing appeals, and consolidating related documents and payments. The platform is branded under CSC Global, a recognized entity in corporate services. The website serves primarily as a secure login portal for existing users, with limited public-facing content on this page. Technically, the site employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and other libraries, and uses ASP.NET MVC framework conventions. Security measures include HTTPS usage and anti-forgery tokens, but visible security headers and privacy policies are absent, indicating room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the site is professional and business-focused with no signs of malicious activity or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching appealtrack.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche real estate sector, focusing on property tax appeal management. Its SaaS model targets real estate professionals and teams requiring streamlined appeal processes. The company leverages CSC Global's brand and infrastructure, suggesting a medium-sized operation with established market presence. The lack of public contact details and policies on this login page suggests a focus on secure, authenticated user access rather than broad marketing. The partnership with CSC Global enhances credibility and market reach. Growth potential lies in expanding appeal management services and integrating additional tax-related functionalities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and anti-forgery tokens implemented in forms. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the company to regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a login portal but requires enhancements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CSC AppealTrack®
Description
Real estate appeal management software CSC AppealTrack® helps teams quickly assess the appeal strength of properties and parcels, prepare and track appeals, and serves as a single, secure source for documents, payments, task tracking, tax data, and more.
Key services
Appeal strength assessment, Appeal preparation and tracking, Document management, Payment processing, Task tracking, Tax data management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, DataTables, Modernizr, Lodash, Bootbox, Typeahead, jQuery UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URL scheme
  • Anti-forgery token in form (__RequestVerificationToken)
  • Password input type used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a secure login portal for CSC AppealTrack real estate appeal management software.
  2. No public privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on this page.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers visible on login page.
  4. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  5. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  6. WHOIS data for subdomain not available, which is typical.
  7. Content is professional and business-oriented with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a mature technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, DataTables, and ASP.NET MVC framework, indicating a stable and maintainable infrastructure. Performance appears moderate with standard libraries and no heavy assets detected on this page. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design elements. However, SEO and accessibility features are basic, with minimal meta tags and no ARIA landmarks visible. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or enterprise solution. Hosting details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation supports business needs but could benefit from modernization and enhanced compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with appealtrack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review appealtrack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.