Skip to main content

Security report for apostol.cz

Apoštol Božího milosrdenství · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.apostol.cz represents a small non-profit religious organization focused on promoting trust in Divine Mercy through a magazine and pilgrimages. The site content is primarily in Czech and targets a religious audience interested in Catholic spirituality and community events. The organization appears to have a stable presence since 2006, with partnerships to related religious entities. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap 5 and jQuery, and is powered by the FenomioFlow CMS platform. The site is mobile responsive and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism implemented, but lacks visible security headers and a published privacy policy. No WHOIS data was found, which reduces trust signals but may be due to privacy protection. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy for its niche audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apostol.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit religious sector, focusing on publishing a magazine and organizing pilgrimages related to Divine Mercy. Its business model is community and faith-based engagement rather than commercial sales. The website shows consistent branding and partnerships with other religious organizations, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. The lack of commercial elements and minimal tracking suggests a focus on privacy and user trust. Growth indicators are not evident from the site, but the long-standing domain and content suggest stable operations. The organization targets a niche religious demographic primarily in the Czech Republic.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS and a cookie consent banner categorizing cookies by function. However, it lacks a visible privacy policy, terms of service, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No contact information for incident response or data protection officers is provided. No analytics or third-party trackers beyond the consent script were detected, minimizing privacy risks. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by publishing privacy and security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection and user rights.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for general inquiries and security incidents.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Add structured data (JSON-LD) to improve SEO and content discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Apoštol Božího milosrdenství
Description
Website for a religious non-profit organization focused on promoting trust in Divine Mercy through a magazine and pilgrimages.
Key services
Religious magazine publication, Information about pilgrimages, Religious community events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5 (carousel, navbar), jQuery, FenomioFlow CMS (implied by footer link), Custom CSS and JS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner with categories

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie consent script from consent.fmm.cz
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain not found in CZ NIC WHOIS.
  3. Site uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with multiple categories.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly present on homepage HTML.
  7. Site content is religious and non-commercial in nature.
  8. Footer contains partner links to related religious organizations.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond cookie consent.
  10. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for scripting. The FenomioFlow CMS platform is used, which is a specialized content management system. Performance appears moderate with optimized images and minimal external dependencies. The site is mobile optimized and has a clear navigation structure. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO features such as Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. No analytics or tracking scripts were found except for the cookie consent script, indicating a privacy-conscious setup.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apostol.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apostol.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.