Skip to main content

Security report for apogi.lv

Apogi · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apogi.lv is a Latvian real estate website promoting a townhouse community near Riga. The business focuses on selling and renting residential townhouses with detailed descriptions of the housing units and community features. The website content is primarily in Latvian with options for Russian and English, targeting local and regional customers interested in residential properties. The site uses older web technologies such as jQuery 1.3.2 and Fancybox 1.2.5, indicating a legacy codebase with room for modernization. Embedded multimedia content includes a YouTube video showcasing the project. Security posture is limited due to lack of visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which impacts compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration insights. Overall, the site presents a legitimate real estate business but requires technical and security improvements to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apogi.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, specifically residential townhouse development near Riga, Latvia. The business model centers on property sales and rentals within a gated community. The website content is professionally presented but lacks detailed business registration or contact information, which could be improved to increase credibility. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests limited focus on regulatory compliance. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, but no advanced marketing or retargeting tools are detected. The company appears to be a small local developer without visible parent or subsidiary relationships. The website's multilingual support indicates an intent to reach a broader audience in Latvia and neighboring regions.

Security posture

The website lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries increases the risk of vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  2. Add and publicly display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance measures.
  3. Update all JavaScript libraries and dependencies to supported, secure versions.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Apogi
Description
Apogi is a residential real estate project consisting of a townhouse community near Riga, Latvia. The development includes 14 houses with 3 to 5 apartments each, with apartment sizes ranging from 180 to 200 square meters. Each apartment has a garage and a private garden area averaging 500 square meters. The apartments feature three bedrooms on the second floor and an open-plan living and kitchen area on the first floor with access to an outdoor terrace.
Key services
Sale of townhouses, Rental of townhouses, Residential community development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.3.2, Fancybox 1.2.5, SWFObject
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian with language options for Russian and English.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content.
  5. Uses outdated JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.3.2, Fancybox 1.2.5).
  6. Includes embedded YouTube video via iframe.
  7. Google Analytics tracking is implemented.
  8. No visible security headers or HTTPS enforcement information available from HTML alone.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  10. Logo image found at /files/images/h_logo.gif with alt text 'logo'.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.3.2, Fancybox 1.2.5) and SWFObject, indicating outdated technology that may affect performance and security. The site includes embedded YouTube content and Google Analytics for tracking. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected. The HTML structure is basic but functional, with some SEO meta tags present. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. Performance is moderate but could benefit from modernization and optimization. No hosting provider or platform information is discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apogi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apogi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.