Skip to main content

Security report for apocaviation.com

APOC - Aircraft Part-out Company · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APOC Aviation is a European-based company specializing in aircraft part-out, leasing, trading, and component support services primarily focused on Airbus and Boeing assets. The company positions itself as an innovative and client-oriented supplier within the aviation industry, offering services such as aircraft acquisition for teardown, engine and landing gear management, and parts supply. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional online presence and a clear focus on aviation sector clients. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder, with integration of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy in appearance, but the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. This discrepancy should be investigated further to ensure full trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in privacy policy publication and security header implementation are recommended to enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apocaviation.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

APOC Aviation operates in the transportation sector, focusing on aircraft part-out and asset management services. Their business model revolves around leasing, trading, and supplying major aircraft components, targeting airlines, MRO providers, and leasing companies. The company leverages industry expertise and a client-centric approach to maintain a strong market position. Their inventory hubs in Amsterdam, Miami, Singapore, and Lithuania indicate a global operational footprint. The presence of customer testimonials and accreditations supports their credibility. However, the lack of direct contact details and missing WHOIS data may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of key security headers reduces defense-in-depth. No direct evidence of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information was found. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and terms of service documentation. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The domain's WHOIS data absence is a notable risk factor, potentially impacting trust and legitimacy assessments.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and verify security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet broader compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and security policy information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
APOC - Aircraft Part-out Company
Description
Meet Europe's most innovative aircraft part-out company. Leasing, trading, aircraft part-out and component support specialists, driven by innovation and passion for aviation.
Key services
Aircraft Acquisition, Engine Management, Landing Gear Management, Parts Supply
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Flickity Carousel, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Analytics, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found in content
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. No obvious security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with modern plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization and WPBakery Page Builder for content layout. It uses jQuery and Flickity for interactive elements and Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS for secure communication. Performance is moderate with no critical errors detected. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The technical infrastructure supports the business needs but should be regularly updated and audited to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apocaviation.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apocaviation.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.