Skip to main content

Security report for apmterminals.com

Apm terminals · Maritime · Netherlands

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

5 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

Checks completed
2of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical, high or medium findings in the checks that completed.

DNS and email look sound, but most checks were blocked, so this is not a full clean result.

Keep watching apmterminals.com

Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.

Daily monitoring

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

Network security
100
Average
100
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

APM Terminals holds a strong market position as a global leader in container terminal operations, partnering with local and national entities to provide comprehensive port and logistics services. Their business model revolves around concession partnerships and value-added services for shipping lines and landside customers. The company targets large-scale logistics and shipping industry players, with growth initiatives including decarbonization and innovation in Africa. The website content and news updates indicate active engagement in industry events and partnerships. However, the lack of publicly available registrant data and contact details on the website may limit direct customer engagement and trust signals. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand and messaging strategy aligned with its global enterprise status.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and secure script loading practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response contact information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is good but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, privacy documentation, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to support incident management and customer trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and structured data markup (JSON-LD/Open Graph) to improve SEO, user experience, and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
APM Terminals
Description
APM Terminals has been lifting standards for developing and operating ports and container terminals for over half a century. With a unique position as the leading container terminal concession partner for local and national partners, advanced products for our shipping line and landside customers around the world and a commitment to supporting thriving local communities – APM Terminals is truly lifting global trade
Key services
Port and container terminal operations, Shipping line services, Landside logistics services, Customer terminal alerts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of crossorigin attribute on scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the content
  4. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools
  5. No forms detected in the provided HTML content
  6. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  7. Website content is focused on corporate information, news, and service offerings
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information
  9. No visible certifications or compliance badges
  10. Website uses HTTPS and loads resources securely
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apmterminals.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apmterminals.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.