Skip to main content

Security report for apmollerfonde.dk

A.P. Møller Fonden · Non-profit · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A.P. Møller Fonden is a well-established Danish commercial foundation founded in 1953 by shipowner A.P. Møller. The foundation focuses on supporting projects in education, culture, and climate adaptation, providing significant grant funding to initiatives aligned with its charter. The website reflects a professional and reputable organization with clear branding and comprehensive content aimed at applicants and the general public interested in the foundation's activities. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap 5 and uses privacy-conscious analytics via Matomo. The cookie consent mechanism is robust, offering detailed categories and compliance with GDPR requirements. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, although some security headers could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though the absence of WHOIS data reduces domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apmollerfonde.dk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position in the Danish non-profit sector, leveraging its historical legacy and financial capacity to support education and cultural projects. Its business model is grant-based, targeting educational institutions, cultural organizations, and climate initiatives. The website's content and navigation are designed to facilitate grant applications and inform stakeholders. The foundation maintains partnerships with privacy-focused service providers such as Cookie Information and Piwik Pro, enhancing compliance and user trust. Growth indicators include recent donations and project support announcements. The foundation's digital presence is mature, with a clear focus on transparency and user engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of a consent management platform, and privacy-respecting analytics. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the site could benefit from implementing additional security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to further harden defenses. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, which could be an area for improvement. Overall, the site aligns well with GDPR and privacy best practices, reflecting a security-aware culture appropriate for a foundation handling personal data.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency if possible to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy perception.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to stay compliant with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A.P. Møller Fonden
Registration number
CVR: 11 66 67 79
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A.P. Møller Fonden
Description
A.P. Møller Fonden is a commercial foundation established in 1953 by shipowner A.P. Møller. The foundation focuses on supporting projects and initiatives aligned with its charter, including education, culture, and climate adaptation.
Key services
Grant funding, Project support, Initiatives in education and culture
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Matomo Analytics, Cookie Information Consent Management
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms implemented
  3. No WHOIS data available from DK registry, possibly due to privacy or registry limitations
  4. Use of privacy-focused analytics (Matomo) and consent management
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels
  7. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs Slick Carousel for sliders and Font Awesome for icons. Google Fonts are used for typography. Analytics are handled by Matomo, a privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics, integrated via a cloud-hosted script. Cookie consent is managed by Cookie Information, providing a detailed and user-friendly consent banner with multiple categories. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs such as jsDelivr and Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some security headers are missing which could be addressed to reduce technical risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apmollerfonde.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apmollerfonde.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.