Skip to main content

Security report for apm.lv

Arco Property Management SIA · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Arco Property Management SIA operates a professional property management website focused on building maintenance and management services primarily in Latvia. The company emphasizes over 10 years of experience and holds ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications, indicating a commitment to quality and environmental management. The website is well-structured, multilingual, and provides clear contact information, supporting its credibility and market presence in the real estate sector. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as jQuery, Foundation CSS framework, and various JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements and responsiveness. The site is accessible, mobile-optimized, and uses HTTPS, though no advanced security headers were detected. No forms or analytics scripts are present, reducing potential attack vectors and privacy concerns. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure. However, the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement in compliance and defense-in-depth strategies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website content and contact details suggest a legitimate and established business. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with good content quality and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and WHOIS transparency would enhance its security posture and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apm.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets property owners and managers in Latvia, offering comprehensive property management services including residential, multi-apartment, and commercial property oversight. Their business model focuses on full-service maintenance, technical audits, and defect remediation, positioning them as a trusted local player with ISO certifications enhancing their competitive advantage. The presence of dedicated portals for residents and commercial clients indicates a customer-centric approach and digital engagement. The company appears small but established, with a clear focus on quality and environmental standards. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The lack of social media presence and minimal marketing tools implies a traditional or localized marketing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no forms collecting sensitive data, reducing risk exposure. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options weakens its defense against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. The lack of analytics and tracking scripts reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but would benefit from implementing best practices and compliance enhancements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Verify and improve SSL/TLS configuration to ensure strong encryption and compatibility.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Arco Property Management SIA
Description
ARCO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT offers full-service building maintenance and management, specializing in commercial property and multi-apartment building management with over 10 years of experience.
Key services
Residential community management, Multi-apartment building management, Commercial property management, Technical audits, Building maintenance and defect remediation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation CSS, Google Fonts, Magnific Popup, Velocity.js, LazyLoad, Picturefill, Polyfiller
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by base href https URL
  • No forms detected to collect sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries.
  4. No forms detected, reducing attack surface.
  5. Privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism.
  6. Contact info clearly displayed with company domain email and phone.
  7. ISO certifications displayed as trust indicators.
  8. No social media links found on the homepage.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. Content is in Latvian with language switcher for English and Russian.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Foundation CSS framework and jQuery, supplemented by libraries for animations, lazy loading, and responsive images. The site is mobile-optimized and loads moderate content efficiently. No CMS or backend technologies are detectable from the frontend. Hosting provider details are not available. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and Open Graph tags included but no structured data or rich snippets detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apm.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apm.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.