Skip to main content

Security report for aplus.lv

A + GRANIT · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

A + GRANIT operates a professional website focused on natural stone products and grave monuments, serving primarily the Latvian market, especially the Daugavpils region. The company offers a broad range of products including granite gravestones, bronze items, metal fences, and related installation services. The website content is well-structured and provides clear contact information, supporting a small business model with a local market focus. Technically, the site uses common JavaScript libraries and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a cookie consent mechanism, though it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or advanced protections. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aplus.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialized provider of grave-related stone and metal products with a focus on craftsmanship and comprehensive service offerings including installation and restoration. The business targets individuals and families in Latvia seeking quality monuments and grave site improvements. The website supports this positioning with detailed service descriptions and local contact information. The absence of privacy policies and security disclosures suggests room for maturity in compliance and trust-building. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The business model is direct sales and service provision, with a likely small-scale operation given the localized address and contact details.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security hygiene with HTTPS usage and a cookie consent banner. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS reduces its security robustness. No forms with explicit security controls were found, and no incident response or security policy information is provided. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files indicates limited transparency in security practices. WHOIS data is unavailable, which hinders full trust evaluation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and enhancing transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add CSRF protection and input validation to any forms collecting user data.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues.
  5. Regularly update third-party libraries and monitor for vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
A + GRANIT
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
A + GRANIT
Description
A + GRANIT is a company specializing in natural stone products including monuments, gravestones, benches, bronze items, vases, and lanterns. They offer custom and ready-made solutions with experienced artists and craftsmen providing engraving and installation services. The company also provides metal fence manufacturing and grave site improvement services.
Key services
Monument manufacturing, Engraving services, Grave site improvement, Metal fence production, Installation and dismantling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Slick Carousel 1.6.0, SweetAlert2, Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Analytics script loaded over https)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  4. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No security policy or incident response information available.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  7. No data protection officer contact found.
  8. Website uses common JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard front-end technology stack including jQuery, Slick Carousel, SweetAlert2, and Fancybox for UI components. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, no CMS or backend platform is identified from the HTML. Performance appears moderate with some external dependencies on CDN-hosted libraries. Accessibility is basic with no explicit ARIA roles or advanced accessibility features detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but minimal keyword and description content. Hosting provider and SSL certificate details are not available from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aplus.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aplus.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.