Skip to main content

Security report for apini.lv

Apiņi · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apiņi is a real estate development project focused on delivering modern, sustainable multi-apartment residential buildings in the Riga suburban area of Latvia. The project offers 18 apartments in its first phase, featuring spacious layouts, terraces, balconies, and high energy efficiency (A class). The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides comprehensive information about the project, finishing, and purchase process. Contact details and consent mechanisms indicate a commitment to user privacy and GDPR compliance. Technically, the site uses WordPress with modern libraries and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and consent banners, but lacks visible security headers and incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is credible and well-positioned in the Latvian real estate market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apini.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Apiņi project targets residential property buyers seeking modern apartments near Riga with convenient infrastructure and natural surroundings. The business model centers on apartment sales supported by detailed information and customer support. Partnerships with financial institutions and service providers are indicated by partner logos. The website's multilingual support and detailed FAQs enhance customer engagement. The project appears to be a small-sized real estate developer with a focus on quality and sustainability. The presence of tracking and marketing tools suggests active digital marketing efforts. The lack of WHOIS data limits full trust assessment but the business information and contact details are consistent and professional.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. The use of multiple third-party scripts and tracking pixels increases the attack surface and requires regular auditing. The contact form includes a consent checkbox, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a real estate website but could be improved with enhanced headers and documented security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Consider adding terms of service and more detailed privacy documentation to strengthen legal compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Elko
Registration number
40003002094
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Apiņi
Description
Pašā Rīgas pievārtē, klusā, privātmāju un priežu meža ieskautā teritorijā top jauns, mūsdienīgs un ilgtspējīgs daudzdzīvokļu dzīvojamo māju kvartāls ar apakšzemes stāvvietām, labiekārtotu teritoriju, ērtu, pilsētas dzīves ritmam atbilstošu infrastruktūru. Pirmajā kārtā pieejami 18 dzīvokļi ar plašiem un pārdomātiem plānojumiem, katram dzīvoklim ir terase un balkons, pabeigta apdare un uzstādīta santehnika, iebūvētas virtuves mēbeles un sadzīves tehnika, inovatīva un ekonomiska apkures sistēma, A klases energoefektivitāte, ērtas pazemes autostāvvietas ar mantu glabātuvi, blakus priežu mežs un privātmāju rajons, Rīgas centrs 15 minūšu brauciena attālumā.
Key services
dzīvokļu pārdošana, dzīvokļu rezervācija, informācijas un atbalsta sniegšana mājokļa iegādei
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.5.2, jQuery 3.6.1, Slick Carousel, Isotope, Magnific Popup, Leaflet.js, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, GetButton.io widget, WP Rocket
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • Consent checkbox on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
GetButton.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed real estate project site for Apiņi apartments in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multilingual support (English, Russian).
  3. Includes cookie consent and privacy policy indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, physical address, and contact form with consent checkbox.
  5. Uses multiple modern web technologies and tracking tools.
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4.5.2 for responsive design and jQuery 3.6.1 for interactivity. It integrates several JavaScript libraries such as Slick Carousel, Isotope, Magnific Popup, and Leaflet.js for maps. Performance is moderate with caching and lazy loading implemented via WP Rocket. SEO is supported by All in One SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The site is mobile optimized and multilingual (Latvian, English, Russian). Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and suitable for the business needs but could benefit from improved security headers and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apini.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apini.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.