Skip to main content

Security report for apeirons.lv

Invalīdu un viņu draugu apvienība Apeirons · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Apeirons is a Latvian non-governmental organization dedicated to advocating for people with disabilities and their friends. The organization focuses on improving accessibility, diversifying social services, promoting employment opportunities, raising public awareness, coordinating volunteer efforts, and providing education and training. The website reflects a well-structured and professionally maintained digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS with modern web technologies and accessibility tools such as ReadSpeaker. Social media integration and regular content updates indicate active community engagement. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and updating legacy libraries. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the overall site professionalism and transparency support a positive legitimacy assessment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apeirons.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a clear mission to support people with disabilities in Latvia. Its market position is that of a specialized advocacy group with a focused target audience including disabled individuals, social workers, and the general public interested in social inclusion. Revenue streams likely include donations, grants, and partnerships, as suggested by donation links and partner sites. The website's partnership ecosystem includes related accessibility and assistance platforms, enhancing its outreach and service delivery. The business model centers on community support and advocacy rather than commercial sales. Growth indicators include active event promotion and multimedia content. Strategic observations highlight a strong emphasis on accessibility and compliance with privacy regulations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent is actively managed, indicating GDPR compliance awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and the use of an outdated jQuery version present potential vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security misconfigurations were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency in security governance. Recommendations include updating third-party libraries, implementing comprehensive security headers, and publishing a security.txt file to improve vulnerability disclosure and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to their latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing clearer user data management options.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Invalīdu un viņu draugu apvienība Apeirons
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Invalīdu un viņu draugu apvienība Apeirons
Description
Apeirons is a non-governmental organization advocating for the interests of people with disabilities, focusing on accessible environment development, diversification of social services, employment, public awareness, volunteer work, and education.
Key services
Advocacy for accessible environment, Social service diversification, Employment support, Public information, Volunteer coordination, Education and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Leaflet 1.3.4, Bootstrap 4 (bootstrap.bundle.min.js), Yoast SEO plugin, ReadSpeaker webReader, RequireJS, CookieConsent, Slick carousel, Perfect Scrollbar, jQuery Migrate
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of integrity attributes on external scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Strong focus on disability advocacy and social inclusion.
  3. Multiple social media channels linked and active.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data; opportunity for improvement.
  6. Use of older jQuery version may pose security risks.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and Leaflet for map integration. It uses several JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.12.4, which is outdated and should be updated. The site loads external resources with integrity attributes where applicable, improving security. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading of images. Accessibility is enhanced by the integration of ReadSpeaker for text-to-speech functionality and a cookie consent banner. SEO is supported by the Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The site is mobile optimized and provides a clear navigation structure. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apeirons.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apeirons.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.