Skip to main content

Security report for apac.lv

TSI/APAC · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

APAC (TSI/APAC) is a specialized aviation training and consulting center based in Riga, Latvia, offering a range of EASA-compliant courses including Part-66 Basic Training, Aircraft Type Training, UAS/RPAS training, and specialized aviation courses. The organization targets aviation professionals such as pilots, maintenance engineers, and drone operators, positioning itself as a recognized provider with international certifications and partnerships, including cooperation with FlightPath International. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and LayerSlider. It demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, but lacks some advanced security headers and published security policies. From a security and compliance perspective, the site includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms and a privacy policy, but lacks visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professional with room for security enhancements. Strategically, APAC should focus on strengthening its security posture by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and conducting regular vulnerability assessments. Enhancing accessibility and performance would improve user experience further. Maintaining GDPR compliance and transparent privacy practices will support trust with European clients. The current digital infrastructure supports their business model effectively but could benefit from modernization and security hardening to mitigate risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching apac.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

APAC operates in the niche aviation training sector, focusing on EASA-compliant courses and consulting services. Its competitive advantage lies in certified training programs recognized internationally and partnerships with established aviation entities. The business model is service-oriented, generating revenue from training fees and consulting contracts. Target customers include aviation professionals and organizations requiring regulatory-compliant training. Growth indicators include a diverse course portfolio and multilingual offerings. The partnership ecosystem includes FlightPath International and social media engagement. Operationally, the company maintains a small but focused presence in Latvia, leveraging digital channels for marketing and client engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by cookie consent and privacy policy presence, but incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are missing. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved to reduce risk and enhance client trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans of WordPress plugins and themes to identify and remediate risks.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
TSI/APAC
Description
Academic and Professional Aviation Center providing aviation training and consulting services.
Key services
EASA Part-66 Basic Training, Aircraft Type Training, UAS/RPAS Training, Specialized Courses, Consulting for Airworthiness, Air Operators, Airports, Pilots
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, LayerSlider
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional aviation training center based in Latvia.
  2. Content is comprehensive with multiple training courses and consulting services.
  3. Multiple contact forms with detailed fields for user inquiries.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy present indicating GDPR compliance.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO optimization.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Enfold theme, with a tech stack including PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, and LayerSlider for interactive content. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with Yoast SEO plugin. Performance is moderate, with some inline styles and scripts for above-the-fold content to speed rendering. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML. The site uses multiple Google services for analytics and fonts. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were identified, but security headers are missing, which is a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with apac.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review apac.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.