Skip to main content

Security report for anwr.se

ANWR Norden AB · Retail · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANWR Norden AB operates as a leading organization in the voluntary shoe retail sector in the Nordic region, founded in 1919 in Hamburg, Germany. The company connects shoe retailers with top brands and offers a portfolio of services tailored to the needs of trade and industry, including financial services through its own bank, DZB Bank. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a clear business model focused on membership services and retail support. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies and a consent management platform but suffers from slow load times and lacks modern CMS or frameworks. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS protocols, despite the presence of HSTS headers. The lack of DMARC, DNSSEC, and other DNS security features further reduces security maturity. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no strong GDPR indicators. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security and performance to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anwr.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ANWR Norden AB holds a strong market position as a leading voluntary shoe retail organization in the Nordic countries, leveraging a long history and a comprehensive service portfolio including financial services. The business model is membership-based, targeting shoe retailers and suppliers. The company benefits from its own banking services, enhancing its competitive advantage. The website content is professionally presented and consistent with the company's branding and market claims. However, the lack of explicit contact information and limited online engagement tools may limit customer interaction. The partnership ecosystem includes domain registrar Loopia AB and external consent management services. Growth indicators are stable given the mature domain age and established market presence.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak, primarily due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is critical for protecting user data and ensuring trust. Although HSTS headers are configured, they are ineffective without HTTPS. The site lacks modern TLS protocols, OCSP stapling, DMARC records, DNSSEC, and CAA records, exposing it to potential DNS and email spoofing attacks. No incident response or security policy information is available, indicating limited transparency and preparedness. The use of a consent management platform is a positive privacy practice but insufficient to compensate for fundamental security gaps. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and DNS security is recommended to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and configure OCSP stapling for certificate validation.
  3. Publish DMARC, SPF, and DKIM DNS records to improve email security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance DNS integrity and restrict certificate issuance.
  5. Add explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and compliance.
  6. Develop and publish security and incident response policies to demonstrate security governance.
  7. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.
  8. Enhance privacy compliance by providing clear GDPR statements and cookie policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anwr Norden AB
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with external scripts for consent management. No modern web frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Hosting is provided by Loopia AB, a known Swedish hosting provider. Performance is slow with a load time exceeding 10 seconds, which may impact user experience and SEO. Mobile optimization is basic, with responsive images and viewport meta tags present but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured navigation but lacks advanced schema or Open Graph metadata. The absence of HTTPS and modern security protocols represents a significant technical risk. The site would benefit from modernization including adoption of a CMS, performance optimization, and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anwr.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anwr.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.