Skip to main content

Security report for antirusa.lv

Antirusa.lv · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Antirusa.lv is a Latvian company specializing in industrial cleaning and protective services, primarily focusing on sandblasting, anti-corrosion treatment for trucks, and industrial/ fireproof painting. Positioned as a leading specialist in the Riga industrial zone, the company offers comprehensive maintenance and restoration services for heavy vehicles and industrial equipment, supported by a large infrastructure and mobile teams. The website reflects a professional business with clear service descriptions and contact information, targeting B2B clients in transportation and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs common analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika, uses Bootstrap for responsive design, and loads resources over HTTPS. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and no privacy or cookie policies, indicating gaps in compliance and security best practices. The site is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, but WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the visible content, but improvements are needed in security headers, privacy compliance, and transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited WHOIS data reduce overall trustworthiness. The company provides clear contact details and social media presence, enhancing credibility. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance, security headers, and domain transparency to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching antirusa.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
90
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Antirusa.lv operates in the industrial maintenance and transportation sector, offering specialized services in anti-corrosion treatment, sandblasting, and industrial painting. The company targets commercial clients owning trucks and industrial equipment, leveraging a large physical facility and mobile teams to provide flexible service delivery. The presence of reputable partners such as Riga City Council and Latvijas Dzelzceļš indicates a solid partnership ecosystem. The business model is B2B service provision with a focus on quality and comprehensive solutions. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and infrastructure capable of handling large equipment. The website content and partner logos suggest a stable market position in Latvia's industrial service niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed via headers. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or HSTS were detected, which are recommended for enhanced protection. No forms collecting sensitive data are present, reducing attack surface. Analytics tools are used without visible consent mechanisms, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, limiting transparency. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but requires improvements in headers, privacy policies, and compliance documentation to meet best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve site security.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to improve domain trust and transparency.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Antirusa.lv
Description
Mūsu specializācija ir visu veidu smilšu strūklas, industriālās tīrīšanas un krāsošanas pakalpojumi. Uzņēmums piedāvā kravas automašīnu pretkorozijas apstrādi, smilšu strūklas apstrādi, industriālo un ugunsdrošības krāsošanu, kā arī mobilos darbus un pilnu aprīkojuma atjaunošanas ciklu.
Key services
Kravas automobiļu pretkorozijas apstrāde, Smilšu strūkla, Industriālā/ugunsdrošības krāsošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data.
  5. Use of common analytics and tracking tools without visible consent mechanisms.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. Website content is professional and relevant to industrial cleaning and painting services.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown but external HTTPS scripts imply HTTPS usage.
  9. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, Draugiem.lv, Google Plus, and YouTube.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern responsive design framework (likely Bootstrap) and includes common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Yandex Metrika, with Google Tag Manager used for marketing management. The site loads resources asynchronously and uses Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO is basic with meta description present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features, indicating technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with antirusa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review antirusa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.