Skip to main content

Security report for anticimex.se

Anticimex · Real Estate · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Anticimex is a well-established Swedish company specializing in pest control, property inspections, fire protection, moisture control, and related services. The company targets both private individuals and businesses, offering a broad range of services including digital pest control solutions, energy declarations, and training programs. The website reflects a strong market position with professional branding and comprehensive service information. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as React and Gatsby, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent mechanisms and a clear privacy policy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and modern practices, though explicit security headers and published security policies are absent. WHOIS data for the queried subdomain is missing, likely due to querying a subdomain rather than the registered domain, which slightly impacts trust but does not detract from the overall legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and clarifying domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anticimex.se

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anticimex operates in the real estate and environmental services sector, focusing on pest control and property health. Their business model is service-oriented, catering to both consumers and commercial clients. The company leverages digital tools and training platforms to extend its service offerings. The presence of a dedicated webshop and training platform indicates diversified revenue streams. The website's clear navigation and extensive service listings support customer engagement and conversion. Partnerships with related domains for e-commerce and education strengthen their ecosystem. The company appears large and established within Sweden, with a consistent brand and high-quality content supporting market leadership.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, which is positive for security. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is good, with cookie consent and privacy policy in place. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data query was unsuccessful for the subdomain, which may indicate a lack of domain registration transparency but is likely due to querying the wrong domain level. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Clarify domain registration information by ensuring WHOIS queries target the registered domain (anticimex.se) rather than subdomains.
  5. Continue maintaining strong privacy compliance and consider publishing data retention policies for analytics and tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anticimex
Description
Genom hållbara lösningar skapar vi hälsosamma miljöer för både företag och privatpersoner. Experter på skadedjurskontroll, matsäkerhet, fuktkontroll, husbesiktningar och brandskydd.
Key services
Skadedjurskontroll (Pest control), Matsäkerhet (Food safety), Fuktkontroll (Moisture control), Husbesiktningar (House inspections), Brandskydd (Fire protection), Digital skadedjurskontroll, Energideklaration, Utbildningar (Training)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, Bing Ads, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of modern JS frameworks
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Professional and comprehensive service offerings in pest control and property services
  3. Modern technology stack with React and Gatsby
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with visible consent mechanism
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  6. WHOIS data query was performed on a subdomain (www.anticimex.se) which is not registered separately, causing WHOIS failure
  7. Clear contact phone number and contact forms present
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Gatsby, indicating a modern, performant static site generation approach. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Bing Ads, and CookieHub for analytics, marketing, and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast due to static generation and CDN usage (cdn.sanity.io). No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS approach. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical implementation is robust with room for improvement in security headers and explicit hosting transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium7 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anticimex.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anticimex.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.