Skip to main content

Security report for anlat.lv

ANLAT, SIA · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANLAT, SIA operates as a Latvian automotive parts retailer specializing in ignition components, fuses, bulbs, coils, and technical fluids. The company targets both individual customers and businesses within Latvia, offering an online catalog and e-commerce platform for product sales. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, indicating a standard e-commerce infrastructure suitable for small to medium-sized businesses. The site is localized primarily in Latvian with Russian language support, reflecting its regional focus. Technically, the website uses common plugins and libraries such as jQuery, Google Analytics, and a mega menu plugin, providing a functional and moderately optimized user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification, but the presence of clear contact information and consistent branding supports a moderate trust level. Overall, the website is a functional, regionally focused e-commerce platform with a good foundation but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anlat.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ANLAT, SIA appears positioned as a local automotive parts supplier in Latvia, leveraging an e-commerce model to reach both retail and business customers. The company offers a broad range of automotive components, indicating a diversified product portfolio within its niche. The website's clear product categorization and contact details suggest a customer-centric approach. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager reflects an interest in marketing and user behavior insights, though the lack of cookie consent may expose compliance risks. The business model relies on direct online sales and informational content to support purchasing decisions. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. Growth potential may be enhanced by improving privacy compliance and expanding digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enforced, protecting data in transit. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source, and AJAX calls use nonce tokens, which is positive. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism and incomplete GDPR compliance indicators represent compliance gaps. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency on security governance. Overall, the site is moderately secure but would benefit from implementing recommended security headers, privacy controls, and formal security policies to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy controls to ensure GDPR compliance and enhance user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ANLAT, SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANLAT, SIA
Description
ANLAT, SIA is a Latvian company specializing in automotive parts and accessories, offering products such as ignition parts, fuses, bulbs, coils, and technical fluids. The website targets Latvian-speaking customers and businesses interested in automotive components.
Key services
Online product catalog, Product sales, Customer support, Information on purchasing and delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Analytics, Mega Menu plugin, Photo Gallery plugin, Child Theme Generator
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site focused on automotive parts.
  2. Content is in Latvian with some Russian language support.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected, indicating partial GDPR compliance.
  5. No security headers detected in HTML source; security posture could be improved.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; domain legitimacy cannot be fully verified.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.1.19 with WooCommerce 3.5.10, utilizing common plugins such as mega menu, photo gallery, and child theme generator. The front-end uses jQuery and Google Analytics scripts, with CSS stylesheets loaded from both local and Google Fonts sources. The site is mobile responsive with a sticky navigation menu and uses AJAX for WooCommerce cart functionality. Performance appears moderate with no evident heavy scripts or blocking resources. Accessibility is basic with some screen-reader labels present but could be improved. SEO meta tags are minimal but canonical and alternate hreflang links are included. The site lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anlat.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anlat.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.