Skip to main content

Security report for ank.ee

Eesti Avatud Noortekeskuste Ühendus · Non-profit · Estonia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eesti Avatud Noortekeskuste Ühendus (Eesti ANK) is a national non-profit umbrella organization in Estonia that connects youth centers across the country. Founded in 2001, it currently represents 95 members with 152 youth centers. The website is currently in maintenance mode, limiting content availability and user engagement. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with a maintenance plugin, utilizing HTTPS and jQuery libraries. However, the site lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and security headers, indicating room for technical maturity improvements. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing key security headers and policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which impacts compliance and user trust. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate and established non-profit entity but requires enhancements in content availability, security, and compliance to improve user trust and operational maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
5of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ank.ee

This scan found 20 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
31

Not counted

  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ank.ee, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
46
Employees
0
Customers
46
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
41%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ank.ee.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit advocacy and networking body for youth centers in Estonia, positioning itself as a key national player in youth services. Its business model focuses on member support and advocacy rather than commercial revenue streams. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's history, reinforcing legitimacy. The lack of contact information and policies on the website may limit stakeholder engagement and transparency. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The organization could benefit from expanding digital presence and compliance documentation to strengthen market position and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a login form secured via POST. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security management. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests gaps in GDPR compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enhance the login form security with anti-CSRF tokens and consider multi-factor authentication.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Improve website content availability and user experience by minimizing maintenance downtime and enhancing mobile responsiveness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eesti Avatud Noortekeskuste Ühendus
Description
MTÜ Eesti Avatud Noortekeskuste Ühendus (Eesti ANK) on üleriigiline eestkosteorganisatsioon, mis ühendab Eestis asuvaid noortekeskusi. Eesti ANK asutati 9. novembril 2001. aastal. Ühendusse kuulub 95 liiget 152 noortekeskusega.
Key services
Advocacy for youth centers, Networking and support for member youth centers
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Maintenance Plugin
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is currently in maintenance mode with minimal content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided
  4. Login form present but no visible security enhancements or multi-factor authentication
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with a maintenance plugin
  7. HTTPS is enabled with no visible SSL issues
  8. No advanced SEO or accessibility features detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with jQuery and a maintenance plugin active, indicating a standard and widely supported technology stack. The site uses HTTPS with no visible SSL issues, but lacks advanced security headers and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO metadata present but minimal. The site currently serves a maintenance page, limiting content delivery and user engagement. There is no evidence of advanced analytics or marketing tools. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist in security and compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ank.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ank.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.