Skip to main content

Security report for anita.com

ANITA & ROSA FAIA · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANITA & ROSA FAIA operates a professional e-commerce platform specializing in high-quality lingerie and swimwear targeted primarily at women in Germany and other European countries. The website is built on the Magento platform and supports multiple languages and country-specific localizations, indicating a mature digital presence. The business appears to be a medium-sized retail entity with a consistent brand image and good content quality. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, OneTrust for cookie consent, and Smile Elasticsuite Tracker for e-commerce tracking. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and appropriate security headers, though public security policies and incident response information are lacking. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. However, the absence of WHOIS domain registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from improved domain registration transparency and enhanced security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anita.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a reputable lingerie and swimwear retailer with a broad European and North American market reach, supported by localized websites and language options. The business model is direct-to-consumer e-commerce with additional B2B operations via a related domain. Key competitive advantages include product quality, fit expertise, and a strong brand presence. Revenue streams are primarily product sales online. The partnership ecosystem includes payment and tracking service providers. Growth indicators include multi-country support and advanced e-commerce features. Strategic observations suggest focusing on domain registration transparency and expanding security and compliance disclosures to strengthen trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent management. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of publicly available security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is evident but could be enhanced with clearer data retention and incident response information. The current security maturity is moderate to good, with room for improvement in policy publication and security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels for security issues.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy disclosures with detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANITA & ROSA FAIA
Description
Bequeme BHs, Slips & Bodies. Lingerie und Bademode mit genialer Passform und höchster Qualität. Entdecken Sie BHs von ANITA und ROSA FAIA.
Key services
Lingerie sales, Swimwear sales, Size guides and fitting assistance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Magento, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Smile Elasticsuite Tracker, EventEmitter JS
Frameworks
Magento e-commerce framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
DotDigital Email Capture
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and targeted at mature female audience for lingerie and swimwear.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly available.
  6. Use of modern e-commerce platform Magento and standard tracking technologies.
  7. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento, a widely used e-commerce platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and various tracking and consent management tools. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of CSS and JavaScript to improve speed. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and hreflang attributes for internationalization. Hosting details are not explicitly identified. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to modernize further by adopting newer JavaScript frameworks and enhancing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anita.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anita.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.