Skip to main content

Security report for animaviva.cz

ANIMA VIVA z.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANIMA VIVA z.s. is a Czech non-profit organization established in 2002, dedicated to providing social services and support to persons with disabilities, particularly those with mental and intellectual disabilities. The organization operates primarily in the Moravian-Silesian region and offers registered social services including social counseling, social rehabilitation, and employment opportunities through sheltered workplaces. Their mission focuses on social inclusion, improving quality of life, and destigmatizing disabilities. The website reflects this mission with relevant content and a clear target audience of disabled persons and their families. Technically, the website uses a modest technology stack including jQuery, bxSlider, lightbox, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. It implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements and uses HTTPS for secure communication. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and accessibility features, and the performance and mobile optimization are basic. The absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the site slightly detracts from the overall trustworthiness. From a security perspective, the site shows good privacy compliance with GDPR statements and cookie consent but could improve by adding security headers and a vulnerability disclosure policy. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. The missing WHOIS data is a concern and should be investigated to confirm domain legitimacy. Overall, ANIMA VIVA z.s. presents as a legitimate, mission-driven non-profit with a functional website that meets basic privacy and security standards. Strategic improvements in security posture, contact transparency, and technical modernization would enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching animaviva.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ANIMA VIVA z.s. holds a niche position as a regional non-profit social service provider in the Czech Republic, focusing on disabled persons. Their funding model relies on public grants, regional and municipal budgets, and donations, typical for non-profits. The organization leverages social media (Facebook) for outreach but lacks broader digital marketing or affiliate partnerships. Their business model emphasizes social impact over commercial revenue. The website content and structure support their mission but show room for growth in digital maturity and transparency. The absence of WHOIS data and limited contact information may hinder stakeholder trust and partnership opportunities. Overall, the organization appears stable but could benefit from enhanced digital presence and clearer business information.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent with granular user controls, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations like GDPR. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are used with consent mode enabled, indicating responsible tracking practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness. The absence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries is positive. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting recommended headers, publishing a security.txt file, and enhancing incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure document (e.g., security.txt) to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Enhance contact information by adding verified company emails and phone numbers to improve trust and user support.
  4. Improve website accessibility and mobile responsiveness to provide a better user experience for all visitors.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ANIMA VIVA z.s.
Registration number
265 91 014
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANIMA VIVA z.s.
Description
ANIMA VIVA z. s. is a non-profit organization founded in 2002 focused on providing social services to persons with disabilities, especially those with mental illnesses or intellectual disabilities, primarily in the Moravian-Silesian region of the Czech Republic. Their mission is to support social inclusion and employment of disabled persons through registered social services and related activities.
Key services
Social counseling (Sociální poradna ANIMA VIVA), Social rehabilitation (Centrum ANIMA Opava), Employment of persons with disabilities on sheltered workplaces, Training café for persons with disabilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, bxSlider, lightbox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieConsent by CookieConsent.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular consent levels
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Czech language targeting local audience in Moravian-Silesian region.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for direct data collection.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented with granular consent levels and GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook only.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  9. Physical address found: Liptovská 1045/21, 747 06 Opava-Kylešovice.
  10. Data Protection Officer named with contact person but no direct email provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery and plugins like bxSlider and lightbox for UI components. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing. Cookie consent is managed by a third-party script with granular consent levels, reflecting GDPR compliance. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is basic, with a mobile menu button present but no advanced responsive design features noted. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. No hosting provider or CDN information is available from the data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated and could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with animaviva.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review animaviva.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.