Skip to main content

Security report for animaleye.cz

ANIMAL EYE, z.s. · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ANIMAL EYE, z.s. is a Czech nationwide non-profit organization dedicated to the enforcement and advocacy of animal rights, primarily focusing on domestic animals. The organization provides legal advisory services, monitors advertisements related to animal breeding, conducts public affairs, and runs awareness campaigns. It positions itself as a credible expert partner for governmental and non-governmental entities in the Czech Republic. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging and active social media presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and libraries, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, supporting the organization's mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching animaleye.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on animal welfare and rights. Its business model relies on donations, public awareness campaigns, and partnerships, including with donation platforms like Donio.cz. The target audience includes animal rights advocates, the general public, and institutional partners in the Czech Republic. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized organization with a specialized niche and a strong local presence. The lack of WHOIS data is consistent with privacy protection practices common among non-profits. The organization maintains a credible market position through professional content, events, and media coverage.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional best practices and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ANIMAL EYE, z.s.
Description
ANIMAL EYE is a nationwide non-profit organization focused on the enforcement of animal rights and interests, primarily domestic animals. It aims to identify and systematically address issues related to animal abuse, prevent their occurrence, and set professional, ethical standards in this field. It acts as a credible expert partner for state and local institutions and other entities involved in animal protection in the Czech Republic.
Key services
Legal advisory, Monitoring of advertisements, Public affairs, Awareness campaigns, Material and financial support to shelters, Organizing events and awards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.13, PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Visual Composer
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script (Google reCAPTCHA)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and focused on animal rights advocacy.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, likely due to privacy protection.
  5. Website uses modern technologies and standard CMS (WordPress).
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter is active.
  7. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information published.
  9. Contact information is present but no explicit emails found in the HTML content.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.6.13 using Visual Composer and Bootstrap frameworks, with jQuery and Font Awesome libraries. It integrates Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from its own domain and trusted external sources. Performance is moderate with some potential for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy/cookie policy pages. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small non-profit organization but could benefit from modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with animaleye.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review animaleye.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.