Skip to main content

Security report for angern.lv

Angern · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angern is a Latvian real estate development company specializing in residential projects primarily located in Mārupe. The company positions itself as a curator of visionary projects, emphasizing quality, sustainability, and attention to detail. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress, featuring multimedia content, project showcases, and team bios that build trust and credibility. Technically, the site employs modern tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity, and it is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image suitable for its target audience of property buyers and investors in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angern.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention angern.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for angern.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Angern operates in the real estate sector with a focus on residential property development. Their business model revolves around developing, marketing, and selling residential units, with projects like MUUNA prominently featured. The company leverages local expertise and emphasizes sustainable development and quality construction. Their partnership with MUUNA.lv indicates a focused project ecosystem. The company targets local and regional buyers seeking quality housing solutions. Investment from Swedbank and detailed project updates suggest growth and financial stability. The website content and social media presence support a transparent and customer-oriented approach, enhancing market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No public security policy or incident response information is available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity introduces potential risks if not regularly audited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure they are up to date and free from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Angern
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Angern
Description
Angern is an ambitious real estate developer with a new approach, curating visions and realizing projects as works of art with care, thoughtfulness, and future outlook. They offer property development services primarily in Mārupe, Latvia, focusing on residential projects.
Key services
Real estate development, Residential project construction, Property sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Splide.js (carousel), Bootstrap (navbar classes), WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and tracking
  3. Clear business focus on real estate development in Latvia
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with emails, phone, and address
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as Splide.js for carousels and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity for analytics and user behavior tracking. The site is multilingual via WPML, supporting Latvian and English. Performance is moderate with optimized images (WebP format) and video content. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, JSON-LD structured data, and canonical links. Accessibility is basic but functional. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a real estate business, though improvements in security headers and accessibility could enhance robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angern.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angern.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.