Skip to main content

Security report for angelplastics.co.uk

Angel Plastics · Retail · United Kingdom

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angel Plastics is a UK-based supplier specializing in plastic building materials such as guttering, fascias, soffits, cladding, and plumbing systems. The company targets construction professionals and DIY enthusiasts, operating primarily through an e-commerce platform. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with a clear product catalog and social media presence. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, ensuring secure user authentication and a responsive design. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures on login, though additional security headers and public security policies are absent. The lack of WHOIS data due to domain registration issues limits domain trust verification, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate. Overall, the site is functional and secure with room for improvement in privacy compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching angelplastics.co.uk

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
60
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Angel Plastics operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, focusing on plastic building products within the UK market. Their business model combines wholesale and e-commerce sales, targeting builders, contractors, and DIY customers. The company maintains an active social media presence and offers a broad product range, which supports market positioning as a specialist supplier. The absence of detailed company registration or VAT information on the website limits deeper business intelligence. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The website's content quality and navigation support customer engagement, though privacy and terms policies are missing, which could impact customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise protecting the login form. The presence of CSRF tokens in forms indicates attention to secure data handling. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense in depth. No public security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Enhancing security headers and publishing security policies would improve the overall security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the website footer.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Provide a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Investigate and resolve WHOIS domain registration issues to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Angel Plastics
Description
Supplier of plastic building products including guttering, fascias, soffits, cladding, drainage, decking, and plumbing systems.
Key services
Plastic Fascia boards, Soffit boards, External wall cladding, Window accessory products, Guttering and drainage products, Garden decking, Plumbing systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Owl Carousel, Flexslider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on login form
  • Secure login form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Twitter widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL and employs Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise on login.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  6. Contact phone number and login form are present, but no company emails or physical addresses found in the provided content.
  7. Social media links include WhatsApp, Twitter (X), Facebook, and Instagram.
  8. Site uses common web technologies and libraries for UI and tracking.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and Font Awesome for icons. Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise is integrated for bot mitigation on login forms. The site loads multiple external scripts from trusted domains such as Google APIs, Facebook, and Twitter, supporting social media integration and analytics. Performance appears moderate with standard libraries and no evident heavy resources. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Technical debt appears low, but adding modern security headers and improving privacy compliance would enhance the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with angelplastics.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review angelplastics.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.