Skip to main content

Security report for andraoto.com

Andra Oto · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Andra Oto is a small Latvian business specializing in personalized accessories and decoration services for weddings, parties, and other events. The company offers a combination of retail sales, decoration rentals, and event planning assistance, targeting individuals and event organizers primarily in Latvia. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides clear navigation and contact information, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Foundation, Swiper.js, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Hosting and domain registration are managed through GoDaddy, with the domain created in 2018, consistent with the business age. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve in security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching andraoto.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on event decoration and personalized accessories. Its business model combines product sales, rentals, and service offerings such as decoration planning and a sewing workshop. The market position is niche and local, with a clear target audience of event planners and individuals organizing weddings and parties. The presence of social media accounts on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing and customer engagement. The domain registration and website content are consistent, indicating legitimacy. The company appears to be small-sized and founded in 2018, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks DNSSEC and important security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No incident response or security policy is published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party scripts such as Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing best practices and transparency in security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them accordingly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Andra Oto
Description
Personalizēti aksesuāri kāzām, ballītēm un mīļām dāvanām. Dažādu noskaņu, veidu, krāsu un stilu dekorācijas pasākumiem, kā arī palīdzība plānošanā un organizēšanā.
Key services
Personalized wedding and party accessories, Decoration services for weddings, parties, corporate events, Decoration rental, Sewing workshop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation CSS, Swiper.js, GLightbox, Instafeed.js, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. Clear business focus on personalized event accessories and decoration services.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone and email.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected.
  6. Modern JavaScript libraries used for UI and analytics.
  7. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports trust.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and consistent with business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Foundation CSS framework, Swiper.js for sliders, GLightbox for lightbox functionality, and Instafeed.js for Instagram integration. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for analytics and tracking. The site appears to be custom-built without a common CMS. Hosting is likely provided by GoDaddy based on WHOIS data. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and deferred script loading. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport meta tags. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. There is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with andraoto.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review andraoto.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.