Skip to main content

Security report for anas-sisma2016.it

Anas S.p.A. · Transportation · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.anas-sisma2016.it serves as an official government portal managed by Anas S.p.A., the implementing entity for restoring road infrastructure in areas affected by the 2016 seismic events in Italy. It provides detailed information on emergency response, technical inspections, and phased interventions across multiple regions. The site targets government agencies, local authorities, contractors, and the public interested in infrastructure recovery. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Matomo analytics, and responsive design elements, offering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Privacy compliance is moderate, with cookie consent present but no explicit privacy or terms of service policies found. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with its government mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching anas-sisma2016.it

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention anas-sisma2016.it, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for anas-sisma2016.it right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Anas S.p.A. operates as a key government agency responsible for transportation infrastructure restoration post-earthquake in Italy. The business model focuses on public works and civil protection implementation, with a large-scale operational footprint across multiple Italian regions. The website reflects a strong government affiliation and serves as an information hub for ongoing projects and news. The use of official branding and detailed project descriptions enhances credibility. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage suggests a focus on informational dissemination rather than direct customer interaction. The site’s partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but it integrates with government analytics and cookie consent providers. Growth indicators include continuous updates on interventions and news.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR principles. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a privacy-conscious approach to user tracking. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The WordPress version is disclosed, which could be minimized to reduce fingerprinting risks. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and security readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from additional hardening and public security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Hide or obfuscate the WordPress version to reduce exposure to targeted exploits.
  3. Publish explicit privacy policy and terms of service documents to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  5. Regularly update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anas S.p.A.
Description
Anas S.p.A. acts as the implementing entity for civil protection and the Ministry of Infrastructure and Sustainable Mobility to restore road viability in territories affected by the 2016 seismic events. The website details the emergency response, technical inspections, and incremental interventions across multiple regions and provinces in Italy, focusing on road network restoration.
Key services
Road network restoration, Technical inspections and assessments, Project management of seismic recovery interventions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Fonts (Roboto, Open Sans), Matomo Analytics, Responsive Lightbox, Ajax Search Lite, TablePress
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP-based CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of Matomo for privacy-respecting analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related portal for seismic event road recovery in Italy.
  2. Content is in Italian and professionally presented.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or main navigation.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for search, lightbox, and tables.
  7. Matomo analytics used, indicating privacy-conscious tracking.
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, leveraging common plugins such as Responsive Lightbox, Ajax Search Lite, and TablePress. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Google Fonts for typography. Matomo analytics is integrated for privacy-respecting user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure or resource loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses a cookie consent banner powered by OneTrust, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, with opportunities for further optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with anas-sisma2016.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review anas-sisma2016.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.