Skip to main content

Security report for analyse2.com

Analyse² · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Analyse² is a B2B company providing advanced retail analytics solutions tailored for FMCG brands and retailers. Their offerings include trade promotion insights and optimization, category analytics, and assortment planning, aimed at driving demand-driven growth and profitability. The company positions itself as a trusted partner to over 100 leading FMCG brands, showcasing logos of notable clients such as Essity, Paulig, Orkla, Fazer, Unilever, and Arla. The website is professionally designed with a clear focus on the retail sector, emphasizing shopper-centric analytics solutions.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching analyse2.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail analytics sector, targeting FMCG brands and retailers with SaaS-based analytics platforms. Their business model revolves around providing actionable insights to optimize promotional activities and product assortments, thereby increasing sales and profitability. The presence of well-known client logos indicates a strong market position and established partnerships. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, which should be addressed to maintain trust. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting the company's credibility in the market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration, ensuring secure data transmission. Cookie consent is managed through CookieHub, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No explicit privacy policy, terms of service, or incident response information is available, which limits transparency and compliance posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended security headers and publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and disclose incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to build trust and readiness.
  4. Provide direct company contact information including verified emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve the absence of WHOIS registration data to confirm domain legitimacy and reduce risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Analyse²
Description
Demand-driven growth solutions for the FMCG industry; brands and retailers.
Key services
A² Trade Promotion Insights, A² Trade Promotion Optimization, A² Category Analytics, A² Assortment Planning for retail
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, CookieHub, Webflow
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear focus on FMCG retail analytics solutions.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual for an active commercial website.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via CookieHub, indicating some privacy compliance effort.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  5. Contact information is only available via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  7. External scripts include Google Tag Manager and CookieHub, common for analytics and consent management.
  8. No social media links or direct company contact emails found in the content.
  9. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies.
  10. Website content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies and content delivery networks for hosting and performance. Google Tag Manager and CookieHub are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management, respectively. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility features. The technical infrastructure supports the business model effectively but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and more transparent privacy controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with analyse2.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review analyse2.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.