Skip to main content

Security report for amit.lv

AMIT Baltic · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AMIT Baltic operates as a software provider specializing in dealer management systems (DMS) for the automotive industry, primarily targeting auto dealers and related businesses in the Baltic region. Their flagship product, AutoMaster, is positioned as a trusted solution recommended by auto manufacturers and importers, serving a medium-sized market with a focus on resource management and process optimization. The website reflects a professional presence with clear branding and client endorsements from major automotive brands, indicating a solid market position. Technically, the website employs legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.8.2 and bxSlider, alongside Google Analytics for user tracking. While the site is accessible and moderately optimized for performance and SEO, mobile optimization and accessibility are basic. The absence of modern frameworks or CMS suggests a relatively simple technical infrastructure. Hosting and domain registration appear consistent and legitimate, with no blocking or WAF interference detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and uses an outdated JavaScript library, which could expose it to vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or advanced security policies. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies found, and no consent mechanisms for tracking, which poses regulatory risks under GDPR. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the website scores moderately well but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security hardening, and modernization of its technical stack to reduce risks and enhance trustworthiness. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, upgrading JavaScript libraries, adding security headers, and enforcing HTTPS to strengthen the security posture and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amit.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AMIT Baltic is positioned as an important player in the transportation sector, providing specialized software solutions for automotive dealers. Their competitive advantage lies in trusted partnerships with auto manufacturers and importers, and a client base featuring prominent automotive brands. The business model focuses on software sales and implementation services for resource and process management in auto dealerships. The company targets auto industry businesses primarily in Latvia and the Baltic states, with offices also in Ukraine. Growth indicators include a broad client portfolio and multi-country presence. The partnership ecosystem is strong, though no explicit subsidiaries or parent companies are identified. The website content and branding reinforce a professional and credible market presence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate but with notable gaps. The use of outdated jQuery versions and absence of security headers increase vulnerability exposure. No privacy or cookie policies indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness and security policies are not documented or visible. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no dedicated contact channels for security incidents. The business impact of these gaps includes potential regulatory penalties and increased risk of exploitation. Enhancing security culture and compliance documentation would improve overall posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Enforce HTTPS across the entire website to secure data in transit.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve security transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AMIT Baltic
Description
Dīleru vadības sistēmas (DMS) AutoMaster ieviešana auto nozares uzņēmumiem. Uzticams partneris sadarbībā ar programmatūras gala lietotājiem.
Key services
AutoMaster DMS software implementation, Resource management software for auto businesses, Process analysis and business control tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.2, bxSlider, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple office locations in Baltic states and Ukraine
  4. No forms detected on the main page for data collection
  5. Use of older jQuery version may pose security risks
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism
  7. Strong branding with client logos from major automotive brands
  8. No visible social media links found in the HTML content
  9. No security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy technology stack with jQuery 1.8.2 and bxSlider for UI components, and Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags and Open Graph data supporting SEO. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected, indicating potential technical debt and limited scalability. Hosting is through a registrar-associated provider (PDR Ltd.), consistent with the domain's EU ccTLD. There is room for modernization by adopting responsive design frameworks, upgrading libraries, and improving accessibility features to enhance user experience and technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amit.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amit.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.