Skip to main content

Security report for amisdelaterre.org

Les Amis de la Terre France · Non-profit · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Les Amis de la Terre France is a well-established non-profit environmental organization founded in 1970, dedicated to protecting the environment, climate, and human rights through investigation, awareness, advocacy, and civil disobedience. The website reflects a mature digital presence with active campaigns, local group news, and donation capabilities, targeting a general audience interested in environmental activism. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA v3 implemented, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is evident with a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism, but no explicit terms of service or security policy pages were found. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the overall site professionalism and content quality support legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amisdelaterre.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit environmental sector in France, with a medium-sized footprint and a strong focus on climate and social justice campaigns. Its business model relies on donations and volunteer engagement, supported by a network of local groups. The website's integration with social media platforms and email marketing tools indicates an active outreach strategy. The lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms. The partnership with web designers and marketing service providers is evident. The organization maintains a consistent brand and messaging aligned with environmental advocacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from abuse, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. The WHOIS data is missing, which is a minor concern but does not directly impact the website's security. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to enhance security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user rights and obligations.
  4. Improve WHOIS data availability or use a registrar that provides complete WHOIS information to enhance legitimacy.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Les Amis de la Terre France
Description
Les Amis de la Terre France est une association créée en 1970 dont le but est de protéger l'environnement, le climat et défendre les droits humains. Nos méthodes d'actions combinent investigation, sensibilisation, plaidoyer et actions de désobéissance civile.
Key services
Environmental protection, Climate advocacy, Human rights defense, Investigation, Sensibilisation, Advocacy, Civil disobedience actions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA v3, SIB Forms, FontAwesome, Rellax.js, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress and reCAPTCHA)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieYes (cookie consent), SIB Forms (email marketing)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French.
  2. Strong focus on environmental activism and social justice.
  3. Multiple active campaigns and local group news.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Bluesky.
  7. No explicit privacy or security certifications displayed.
  8. No terms of service page found.
  9. Cookie consent mechanism implemented.
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including JavaScript libraries such as Rellax.js for parallax effects, FontAwesome for icons, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, and integrates SIB Forms for email subscription management with reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is fast due to caching and minification. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amisdelaterre.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amisdelaterre.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.