Skip to main content

Security report for ambrosepg.com

Ambrose Property Group · Real Estate · United States

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ambrose Property Group is a medium-sized, MBE-certified real estate development and investment company specializing in industrial, logistics, and e-commerce properties. Founded in 2008, the company has developed over 29.5 million square feet of industrial space and manages projects valued at approximately $3.5 billion. Their business model focuses on speculative and build-to-suit developments, supported by discretionary private equity fund management. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear messaging targeting industrial clients and investors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Leaflet.js for mapping. It uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and SEO. Hosting is through IONOS SE, consistent with the domain registrar. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is enforced, and reCAPTCHA is implemented, but DNSSEC is not enabled and no security headers were detected in the HTML content. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism or detailed cookie policy, which impacts privacy compliance. WHOIS data shows a consistent and legitimate domain registration matching the company's founding date and business claims. Overall, AmbrosePG.com is a credible and professional website representing a legitimate real estate business with good technical implementation. Security and privacy compliance can be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and implementing cookie consent mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ambrosepg.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ambrose Property Group holds a strong market position in the industrial real estate sector, focusing on logistics and e-commerce properties. Their competitive advantage lies in their MBE certification, fund management capabilities, and a client-first approach emphasizing honesty, integrity, and agility. The company targets industrial clients needing speculative or build-to-suit developments and investors seeking fund management opportunities. Their portfolio includes large-scale projects across multiple U.S. markets, indicating geographic diversification and growth potential. The website's testimonials and professional content reinforce trust and client satisfaction. Partnerships include secure investor portals and social media engagement, supporting a robust ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA v3 protecting forms. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may limit transparency and readiness perception. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and detailed cookie policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score reflects these strengths and gaps, suggesting improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Add a comprehensive cookie policy and implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to enhance trust and demonstrate preparedness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable versions are in use and maintain updated dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ambrose Property Group
Description
Industrial, logistics and e-commerce real estate development and investment company focused on speculative and build-to-suit projects.
Key services
Speculative Development, Build-to-Suit Development, Fund Management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Leaflet.js, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear business focus on industrial real estate development and investment.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple office addresses and phone number.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner or detailed cookie policy found.
  5. Security headers and DNSSEC are missing, representing moderate security posture.
  6. Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 enhances form security.
  7. No visible vulnerability or malware indicators.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA v3 are integrated for analytics and security respectively. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. Hosting is through IONOS SE, consistent with domain registration. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ambrosepg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ambrosepg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.