Skip to main content

Security report for amberjet.net

Amber Jet Group · Transportation · Latvia

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amber Jet Group is a specialized business aviation company offering private jet charters, aircraft sales and acquisition, aircraft management, and ground handling services primarily in Europe. Founded in 2016, the company has grown from a small charter broker to a diversified aviation group with its own fleet and offices in Latvia and Lithuania. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with clear branding and comprehensive service descriptions targeting corporate and leisure aviation clients. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Lenis for smooth scrolling, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare infrastructure, employing Turnstile captcha for form security and Finsweet Cookie Consent for privacy compliance. The website is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, with good SEO practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA on forms to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented with opt-in options, supporting GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, indicating areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly, reducing trust in domain registration transparency. Overall, Amber Jet Group presents a credible and professional business aviation service with a strong digital footprint but should address domain registration transparency and enhance security headers and incident response disclosures to improve trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amberjet.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Amber Jet Group operates in the European business aviation sector, focusing on high-net-worth individuals and corporate clients requiring private jet charters and related aviation services. Their competitive advantage lies in offering a full suite of aviation services including aircraft sales, management, and ground handling, supported by a dedicated team and own fleet. The business model is service-oriented with revenue streams from charter bookings, aircraft transactions, and management fees. The company targets a niche market of luxury and corporate travelers, with growth indicators including expansion of offices and fleet. Partnerships with aviation service providers and digital marketing via social media enhance their market presence. Strategic observations suggest a focus on maintaining high service quality and expanding operational capabilities to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA protection on forms to prevent automated attacks. Privacy compliance is well addressed through cookie consent and privacy policies. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies indicate gaps in security maturity. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy verification and could be a risk factor. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved by implementing additional security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure program.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish an incident response or abuse contact page to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG standards, improving usability and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Amber Jet Group
Description
Amber Jet Group is a global partner for private jet charters, aircraft sales, management, and world-class aviation services.
Key services
Private Jet Charters, Aircraft Sales and Acquisition, Aircraft Management, Aircraft Ground Handling
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, jQuery, Lenis smooth scrolling, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Turnstile captcha, Finsweet Cookie Consent
Platforms
Webflow CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cloudflare Turnstile captcha on forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Finsweet Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. Professional aviation services company with clear branding
  3. Multiple contact methods and social media presence
  4. Strong privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, no-code CMS platform (Webflow) with integration of popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Lenis for enhanced user experience. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security features. Performance is optimized with fast loading videos and images served via CDN. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO best practices with meta tags and Open Graph data. Cookie consent and analytics are managed with third-party tools ensuring privacy compliance. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on third-party scripts and lack of some security headers. Opportunities exist to improve security posture and incident response capabilities to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amberjet.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amberjet.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.