Skip to main content

Security report for ambercranes.eu

AmberCranes · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AmberCranes is a medium-sized transportation company specializing in heavy lifting and transporting solutions, including cranes, forklifts, trucks, and trailers rental. With over 15 years of experience, the company operates primarily in the Baltics, Scandinavia, and Europe, offering modern and safe equipment supported by an experienced team. The website reflects a professional business model focused on equipment rental and specialized transport services. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as Alpine.js and Swiper.js, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection on forms, and cookie consent, although some security headers and explicit security policies are missing. Overall, the site is trustworthy, well-branded, and provides clear contact information and social media presence, supporting business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ambercranes.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AmberCranes holds a solid market position as an international heavy lifting and transport service provider with a focus on equipment rental. Their competitive advantage lies in a wide range of modern machinery and professional engineering support for complex lifting projects. The business model is service and rental-based, targeting construction, industrial, and logistics sectors across multiple European countries. The company leverages digital channels including social media and online contact forms to engage customers. Growth indicators include multilingual site versions and a broad geographic service area. Partnerships are implied through social media and chamber of commerce logos, but no explicit partner domains were found. The company appears stable with consistent branding and a clear value proposition.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and CSRF tokens implemented on all forms, reducing risk of common web attacks. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking or content injection risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adding security headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata for improved user experience and search engine ranking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AmberCranes
Description
Ready to respond to all requirements and challenges. CRANES AND TRANSPORTING SERVICES RENTALS. Check out our selection of vehicles. Wide range of machinery constantly developed to carry out customer tasks. Modern and safe equipment in lifting, special transport and heavy goods handling. Complete solutions served by experienced and professional team. Services offered from local depot to Baltics, Scandinavia and Europe. Challenging lifting processes followed by calculations and drawings, proceeded with lifting procedure by step plan prepared by Engineering Department specialists.
Key services
Cranes rental, Forklifts rental, Trucks rental, Trailers rental, Heavy lifting and transporting services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Alpine.js, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Fancybox
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • CSRF token implemented in forms
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of HTTPS
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive contact forms with CSRF protection are implemented.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. Social media presence is active and linked.
  6. No terms of service page detected.
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. Business information is consistent and credible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Alpine.js for interactivity and Swiper.js for sliders. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses Fancybox for modal dialogs. The HTML is well-structured with responsive design elements ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading of images. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting appears to be with GoDaddy.com, LLC as registrar, but hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical debt is low with no visible broken elements or errors. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and add progressive web app features for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ambercranes.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ambercranes.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.