Skip to main content

Security report for amazonleasing.com

Amazon Leasing · Transportation · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Amazon Leasing is a small business specializing in exotic and luxury vehicle leasing, offering closed end leases without prepayment penalties. The website presents basic business information primarily through structured data and minimal textual content. The target audience appears to be individuals or businesses interested in leasing high-end vehicles. Technically, the website uses JavaScript and integrates Google Analytics and Vimeo Player API, hosted on A2 Hosting. However, the site suffers from very slow load times and lacks modern performance optimizations. Security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, no security headers, and no visible security or privacy policies. These issues expose visitors to potential risks and reduce trustworthiness. Privacy compliance is poor, with no cookie or privacy policies and minimal contact information limited to a phone number. Overall, the site requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and performance to meet professional standards and build user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of amazonleasing.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching amazonleasing.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
40
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the transportation sector, focusing on leasing exotic and luxury vehicles. Its niche market positioning targets customers seeking premium vehicle leasing options with transparent terms. The business model revolves around closed end leases without prepayment penalties, emphasizing fast payment and full disclosure. The website lacks detailed business information such as founding year, physical address, or email contacts, limiting transparency. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of Google Analytics indicates some level of digital marketing, but absence of privacy policies may hinder compliance and customer confidence. Growth potential depends on improving digital presence, security, and trust signals.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The website does not have a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS encryption, which is a critical vulnerability exposing users to data interception risks. No security headers such as HSTS or Content Security Policy are implemented. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of Google Analytics without clear privacy disclosures further exacerbates compliance gaps. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident. Immediate remediation is required to secure the website and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Improve website performance by optimizing resources and reducing page load time.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to enhance security transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML and JavaScript, including integration of Google Analytics and Vimeo Player API. It is hosted on A2 Hosting as indicated by DNS records and SPF records. The site lacks a CMS or known frameworks. Performance is poor with a load time exceeding 32 seconds and a large page size over 1.2 MB, indicating unoptimized assets. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with minimal metadata and SEO tags. No forms or interactive data collection mechanisms are present. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, improving performance, and enhancing SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 42/100High24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with amazonleasing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amazonleasing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.