Amarantostudio is a small architectural and urban design studio based in Italy, founded in 2017. The company offers services including interior design, architecture, urban planning, and creative direction, targeting both private and public clients. The website reflects a niche market position with a professional and consistent branding approach. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Sanity CMS, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no privacy or terms of service pages. Contact information is minimal, limited to a WhatsApp phone number and social media links. Overall, the website is professional and safe, but improvements in security headers, privacy policies, and contact transparency are recommended.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention amarantostudio.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for amarantostudio.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The business operates in the real estate sector focusing on architectural and urban design services. Its competitive advantage lies in a transdisciplinary approach centered on human relationships with objects, spaces, and nature. The business model is service-oriented, catering to both private and public clients. The company maintains a small size with no visible subsidiaries or parent company. Social media presence on Instagram and Facebook supports marketing efforts. The website content quality and navigation are good, supporting user engagement and brand positioning in a specialized market niche.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but no known vulnerabilities were detected in the visible content. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and documented policies.
Recommendations
Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common attacks.
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
Provide clear contact information including email and physical address to enhance business credibility and user support.
Establish an incident response contact channel and consider publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
amarantostudio
Description
amarantostudio progetta a diverse scale architettoniche ed urbane, rispondendo alle esigenze del cliente, sia privato che pubblico.
Key services
Interior design, Architecture, Urban planning, Creative direction
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
JavaScript, Tailwind CSS, Nuxt.js, Sanity CMS
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party script
Contact information limited to WhatsApp phone link; no email or physical address found
Modern tech stack with Nuxt.js and Sanity CMS
No security headers detected in HTML response
Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics and tracking
No forms detected on the homepage or main content
Content is professional and relevant to architectural services
No explicit or adult content detected
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a modern JavaScript framework (Nuxt.js) with Tailwind CSS for styling and Sanity CMS for content management. The site loads multiple JavaScript modules and uses modulepreload for performance optimization. The presence of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicates integration with marketing and analytics tools. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph tags. Hosting appears to be managed via Register SPA with Italian nameservers. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with amarantostudio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review amarantostudio.com.