Skip to main content

Security report for alwark.lt

Alwark · Transportation · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alwark is a Lithuanian company specializing in the sale and rental of new and used loading, construction, storage, intralogistics, port, airport, and municipal equipment. The website targets businesses and professionals in need of industrial and construction machinery and related services. The company appears to hold a regional market position within Lithuania, offering a range of equipment and rental solutions. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (both Universal and GA4), Cookiebot for cookie consent management, Tawk.to for live chat support, and Meta Pixel for marketing tracking. The site is well-structured with responsive design and uses web fonts for improved aesthetics. Security-wise, HTTPS is implied and cookie consent is actively managed, but explicit security headers and policies are not evident. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website demonstrates a moderate security posture with room for improvement in transparency and contact availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alwark.lt

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alwark operates in the transportation and industrial equipment sector, focusing on equipment sales and rentals. Their business model combines direct sales with rental services, targeting local Lithuanian businesses requiring specialized machinery. The website content and technology stack suggest a professional digital presence, though lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may impact customer trust. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics tools to optimize user engagement and advertising effectiveness. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. Growth potential may be enhanced by improving transparency and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website shows a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, and no security or incident response policies are published. The presence of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of WHOIS data and contact information for security incidents reduces overall security trustworthiness. Compliance with GDPR is partial, mainly through cookie consent, but privacy policy absence is a gap.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers on the website for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy and security risks.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS data or use a registrar that allows public WHOIS to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alwark
Description
Alwark prekiauja nauja ir naudota krovos, statybų, sandėliavimo, intralogistikos, uostų, oro uostų bei komunaline technika ir įranga. Teikia nuomos paslaugas.
Key services
Sale of new and used loading equipment, Sale of construction and storage equipment, Intralogistics equipment, Port and airport equipment, Municipal equipment, Equipment rental services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (Universal and GA4), Cookiebot for cookie consent, Tawk.to live chat, Meta Pixel (Facebook tracking), Google Fonts (Open Sans, Bebas Neue), CSS stylesheets, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by asset URLs
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out toggles
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (Universal and GA4), Hotjar
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Tawk.to
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie categories.
  2. Multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts are active.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  6. Website content is in Lithuanian language targeting local market.
  7. Use of modern web fonts and responsive design is evident.
  8. Live chat integration via Tawk.to is present.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (Universal and GA4), Cookiebot for consent management, Tawk.to for live chat, and Meta Pixel for marketing. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses CSS for styling. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site could benefit from improved accessibility features and enhanced security headers. The cookie consent implementation is detailed and user-friendly, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence but has opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alwark.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alwark.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.