Skip to main content

Security report for alusteika.lv

SIA Baltic Oak · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alus darbnīca TEIKA is a small local brewery and bar located in Riga, Latvia, operating under the company SIA Baltic Oak. The business focuses on craft beer production, on-site tasting, retail sales, and home delivery through popular platforms such as WOLT and BOLT FOOD. The website provides detailed product offerings, working hours, and contact information, targeting local beer enthusiasts and consumers. Technically, the site is built on Mozello CMS, uses common JavaScript libraries, and is hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance elements such as a privacy policy and cookie consent. Tracking is implemented via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, but without clear user consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alusteika.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on craft beer production and sales. Its business model combines physical bar/shop presence with digital delivery channels, leveraging third-party platforms for home delivery. The market positioning is local and niche, appealing to craft beer consumers in Riga. The presence of a company registration number and physical address supports legitimacy. Social media engagement on Facebook and Instagram helps build community and brand awareness. The business appears small-sized with no subsidiaries or parent companies indicated. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital presence and improving compliance to attract a broader customer base.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, protecting data in transit. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface, but lack of privacy policy and cookie consent indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. Tracking via Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics is present without explicit user consent, posing privacy risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly update third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Baltic Oak
Registration number
40103789546
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Baltic Oak
Description
Alus darbnīca TEIKA is a brewery and bar/shop located in Riga, Latvia, offering a variety of craft beers including seasonal and specialty brews. They provide on-site tasting and take-away options, with home delivery via WOLT and BOLT FOOD platforms.
Key services
Craft beer production, On-site bar and tasting, Beer sales for take-away, Home delivery via third-party platforms
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Mozello CMS scripts, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address clearly provided.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram with direct links.
  6. Website uses Mozello CMS with common JS libraries and CDN hosting.
  7. HTTPS is enabled but security headers are missing.
  8. No forms detected on the main page; no user data collection forms present.
  9. Content focuses on craft beer sales, bar services, and delivery options.
  10. No explicit adult or NSFW content; alcohol content rated as questionable for mature audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Mozello CMS with a tech stack including jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and tracking scripts for Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Hosting is via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, providing reliable content delivery. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links present. Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and image lazy loading implemented. No broken elements or errors were detected. Technical debt appears low but updating to newer JavaScript libraries and improving security headers would modernize the infrastructure and reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alusteika.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alusteika.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.