Skip to main content

Security report for alternatyviai.lt

VšĮ Alternatyviai · Non-profit · Lithuania

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alternatyviai is a Lithuanian non-profit organization founded in 2020, dedicated to promoting active and creative outdoor lifestyles among youth. Their offerings include sports such as Slackline, Acroyoga, and Parkour, alongside organizing camps and community events. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Contact Form 7, with Google reCAPTCHA implemented for spam protection on the contact form. Hosting is provided by HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a reputable provider. The site is accessible, well-structured, and provides clear contact information, including email, phone, and physical address. Privacy policy is present but basic, and no cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating partial GDPR compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alternatyviai.lt

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization targets young people interested in active and creative leisure activities in Lithuania, positioning itself as a community-focused non-profit. Its business model revolves around promoting healthy lifestyles through sports and cultural events. The website content and structure support this mission, with clear descriptions of activities and events. The presence of social media links, especially Facebook, indicates engagement with the community. The domain age and registration details align with the organization's founding date, supporting legitimacy. The use of WordPress and popular plugins suggests a cost-effective digital presence suitable for a small organization. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect its contact form from spam. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency in handling security issues. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and limited GDPR compliance indicators suggest privacy compliance gaps. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with additional measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
VšĮ Alternatyviai
Registration number
300650677
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
VšĮ Alternatyviai
Description
Mūsų misija yra skatinti jaunus žmones kuo daugiau leisti laisvalaikį aktyviai ir kūrybiškai gamtoje! Veiklos apima Slackline, Akrojoga, Parkūras ir organizuoja stovyklas bei renginius.
Key services
Slackline sportas, Akrojoga praktika, Parkūras, Stovyklos, Renginiai
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA, SumoMe
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Seventeen Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
SumoMe
Marketing tools
SumoMe
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small non-profit focused on youth active lifestyle and creative outdoor activities.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Contact Form 7 plugins.
  3. Includes Google reCAPTCHA for spam protection on contact form.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. Privacy policy is present but basic and not explicitly GDPR compliant.
  6. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  9. External links mostly to trusted domains such as Google Fonts, YouTube, and WordPress.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a standard WordPress platform using the Twenty Seventeen theme and Elementor page builder, indicating a modern but common CMS setup. It uses Contact Form 7 for form handling and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for spam prevention. External resources include Google Fonts and YouTube embeds, which are standard and reliable. Hosting is provided by HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a known hosting provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations detected. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive design from Elementor. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility is basic with some screen reader text but could be improved. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alternatyviai.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alternatyviai.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.