Skip to main content

Security report for alr.lv

SIA "Auto Lukturu Remonts" · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Auto Lukturu Remonts" operates a Latvian website alr.lv offering specialized automotive headlight repair services including glass replacement, reflector replacement, polishing, and wiring repairs. The company targets vehicle owners in Latvia, particularly in Riga, providing localized services with guarantees and cooperation with CSDD (Latvian Road Traffic Safety Directorate). The website demonstrates a small business model focused on service delivery with clear contact details and customer testimonials, indicating a moderate market presence in the automotive repair sector. Technically, the website employs a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, and Revolution Slider. It integrates Matomo and Google Tag Manager for analytics, showing a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and has good design quality but lacks advanced accessibility features and comprehensive SEO optimizations. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with better headers, policies, and transparency. The overall risk is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure information, and improving accessibility and SEO. These steps would enhance trust, compliance, and security posture, supporting business growth and customer confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alr.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a niche automotive service provider specializing in headlight repairs in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a wide range of headlight-related repairs with guarantees and official cooperation with CSDD, which may appeal to local customers seeking reliable service. The business model is service-based with direct customer engagement via phone and email. The website content and testimonials suggest a focus on quality and customer satisfaction. The presence of a Google Maps embed and Facebook page supports local marketing efforts. There is no evidence of e-commerce or online booking, indicating a traditional service delivery approach. Growth indicators are limited but the company maintains a professional online presence. Partnerships appear limited to the web development company (dod.lv).

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a GDPR compliance gap. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The use of Matomo and Google Tag Manager indicates some level of user tracking, but privacy compliance is minimal. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to enhance web security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly monitor and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Auto Lukturu Remonts"
Registration number
40203422792
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Auto Lukturu Remonts"
Description
Mēs piedāvājam visa veida palīdzību auto lukturu remontā. Mēs centīsimies atrisināt visas problēmas, kas ir radušās ar Jūsu lukturiem. Garantija, CSDD sadarbība un centīsimies garantēt zemāko cenu.
Key services
Lukturu stiklu maiņa, Lukturu korpusu maiņa, Reflektoru maiņa, Lukturu slīpēšana un pūlēšana, Lukturu svīšanas novēršana, Lukturu stiprinājumu remonts, Luktura stara maiņa uz EU, Lukturu vadu remonts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Revolution Slider, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://alr.lv/)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content about automotive headlight repair services.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain trust analysis.
  4. Website uses modern front-end technologies and analytics tools.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  8. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook and Google review links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Font Awesome for icons, Owl Carousel for sliders, and Revolution Slider for advanced banner effects. Analytics are implemented via Matomo and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital analytics maturity. The site is mobile optimized and loads multiple CSS and JS assets, resulting in moderate performance. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the HTML. The site lacks advanced SEO features and accessibility enhancements. There is no evidence of server-side technologies or security headers in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alr.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alr.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.