Skip to main content

Security report for alpinecars.si

AOI d.o.o. · Transportation · Slovenia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alpine Cars Slovenija operates as an official regional dealer for the Alpine automotive brand in Slovenia, offering a range of Alpine car models, test drives, financial services, and after-sales support. The website is designed to showcase the brand's offerings and facilitate customer engagement primarily through contact forms and informational content. The business is relatively new, established in 2021, and targets automotive enthusiasts and potential buyers within Slovenia. The site leverages modern web technologies including Nuxt.js, Alpine.js, and jQuery, hosted on a CDN for performance optimization. Google Analytics and OneTrust are used for analytics and cookie consent management respectively. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner but no dedicated privacy policy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is professional and consistent with the Alpine brand, though improvements in transparency and security documentation are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpinecars.si

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alpinecars.si, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alpinecars.si right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company AOI d.o.o. serves as the official Alpine Cars distributor in Slovenia, positioning itself in the transportation sector with a focus on premium automotive sales and services. The business model revolves around direct sales, test drives, and financing solutions, targeting a niche market of Alpine car enthusiasts and buyers. The website reflects a clear brand alignment and consistent messaging, supporting customer acquisition and engagement. The presence of media links and financial services indicates a comprehensive approach to customer support. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the business's recent establishment, supporting legitimacy. No evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found, suggesting a focused regional operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, there is no evidence of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure programs. Security headers and advanced protections are not visible in the provided data. The absence of explicit contact emails or phone numbers for security or abuse reporting limits incident response readiness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. To enhance security maturity, the company should publish clear security policies, implement comprehensive HTTP security headers, and provide incident response contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement and document security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  3. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Provide explicit contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AOI d.o.o.
Description
Official Slovenian website for Alpine Cars, showcasing models, media, services, and contact options. Focus on legendary automotive brand Alpine with emphasis on test drives and financial services.
Key services
Car sales, Test drives, Financial services, After-sales service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 3.5.1, Alpine.js v1.9.3, Google Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
Nuxt.js (implied by _nuxt paths)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link with http but site likely supports https)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Contact information primarily via contact forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in visible content
  5. Use of modern JavaScript frameworks and CDN hosting
  6. No visible security headers data to confirm best practices
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy of domain and business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks including Nuxt.js and Alpine.js, supported by jQuery for legacy compatibility. Hosting via Amazon Cloudfront CDN ensures global content delivery and performance optimization. Google Analytics and OneTrust scripts are integrated for analytics and cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data present but could be enhanced. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpinecars.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpinecars.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.