Skip to main content

Security report for alpinebuses.com

Alpine Buses · Transportation · France

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alpine Buses operates a private transfer service specializing in airport and resort transfers in the Alpine region, servicing major airports such as Geneva, Zurich, Munich, Lyon, and Grenoble. The company targets travelers seeking reliable and comfortable transportation to ski resorts and other Alpine destinations. Their business model is primarily online booking through a WordPress-based website integrated with WooCommerce and Stripe for payments. The company positions itself as a trusted and experienced provider with a large fleet and official partnerships, including with Geneva Airport and ski equipment provider Skiset. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform with common plugins and libraries such as jQuery and Select2. Hosting is provided by Bluehost, and the domain is registered via GoDaddy. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some improvements could be made in accessibility and cookie consent compliance. Performance is moderate, with no major technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not explicitly detected, which are areas for improvement. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be enhanced to improve trust and compliance. Privacy compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, Alpine Buses presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with a solid business model and technical foundation. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, adding cookie consent for GDPR compliance, and publishing security and incident response policies to further strengthen security posture and customer trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpinebuses.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
58
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alpinebuses.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alpinebuses.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alpine Buses is positioned as a specialized transportation provider in the Alpine region, focusing on private airport transfers to ski resorts and other destinations. Their competitive advantage includes a large fleet of new minibuses, official partnerships with airports, and integration with ski equipment rental services. The business model relies on direct online bookings, targeting tourists and ski travelers primarily from Europe. Growth indicators include a significant number of transfers and passengers served, as well as 24/7 customer support. The partnership ecosystem includes payment processing via Stripe and ski equipment booking via Skiset, enhancing service offerings. The company’s operations appear stable and consistent with domain registration data, supporting credibility and market presence.

Security posture

The security maturity of Alpine Buses is moderate. The website enforces HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. Domain registration includes multiple client-side prohibitions to prevent unauthorized domain transfers or updates, enhancing domain security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to protect against DNS spoofing. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others are not detected, representing a potential area of vulnerability. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the analysis. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is secure for typical business operations but could improve in advanced security controls and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and customer trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins, themes, and dependencies to minimize vulnerabilities and technical debt.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Alpine Buses
Description
Passenger transfer services with maximum comfort from/to resort destinations in the Alpine region, servicing airports including Geneva, Zurich, Munich, Lyon, and Grenoble.
Key services
Private airport transfers, Transfers in France, Italy, Germany, Austria, Ski equipment booking partnership
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Select2, Stripe (payment gateway)
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientDeleteProhibited domain status
  • ClientRenewProhibited domain status
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • ClientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed WordPress site with WooCommerce integration for booking transfers.
  2. Clear contact information with phone and email prominently displayed.
  3. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security improvement.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram.
  7. Partnership with Skiset for ski equipment booking.
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2 with WooCommerce 9.8.4, leveraging common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Select2 for UI enhancements. Payment processing is integrated via Stripe. Hosting is provided by Bluehost, and the domain is registered with GoDaddy. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards with responsive design for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with some room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained infrastructure. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and implement GDPR cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpinebuses.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpinebuses.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.