Skip to main content

Security report for alpi.lt

UAB ALPI Baltika · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB ALPI Baltika is a Lithuanian transport and logistics company operating since 2006, providing a wide range of freight forwarding and transportation services including land, sea, and air transport, customs brokerage, and warehousing. The company is part of a larger network of over 60 companies across Europe and globally, positioning itself as a reliable regional player in the logistics sector. Their website reflects a professional service offering with clear navigation and multilingual support, targeting businesses and individuals requiring comprehensive logistics solutions. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Fancybox, and Swiper, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is served over HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a baseline compliance with privacy regulations. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility features. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the website content and external partnerships support legitimacy. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests an opportunity to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from strengthened security and compliance documentation. Strategically, ALPI Baltika should focus on improving security best practices, publishing clear policies, and verifying domain registration details to bolster trust and compliance in the competitive logistics market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alpi.lt

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ALPI Baltika operates in the transportation sector with a medium-sized business model focused on freight forwarding and logistics services. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive network of partner companies and membership in the ELITE Global Logistics Network, which enhances their market reach and service reliability. Revenue streams likely derive from multimodal transport services, customs brokerage, and warehousing. The target customers include businesses requiring international and domestic freight solutions. The company demonstrates growth through digital presence and partnerships but lacks visible certifications or advanced compliance frameworks on their website. Strategic observations suggest a stable regional presence with potential for expansion through enhanced digital and security maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. There is no evidence of GDPR-specific compliance documentation beyond the privacy policy. Incident response readiness is unclear due to missing contact channels for security issues. Overall, the security culture appears basic and would benefit from formalized policies and improved technical controls to reduce risk and enhance stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Conduct regular audits of third-party libraries and dependencies to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB ALPI Baltika
Description
UAB „ALPI Baltika“ - transporto ir logistikos paslaugų kompanija, kuri vienija daugiau nei 60 kompanijų Europoje bei visame pasaulyje. Lietuvoje nuo 2006 m. Mūsų paslaugos: krovinių gabenimas, pervežimas (jūrų, oro, žemės transportu) tiek Lietuvoje, tiek užsienyje; muitinės paslaugos; sandėliavimas.
Key services
Krovinių gabenimas, Pervežimai jūra, Pervežimai oru, Transporto paslaugos, Logistikos paslaugos, Muitinės paslaugos, Sandėliavimas, Tarptautinis krovinių pervežimas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Fancybox, Swiper, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or invalid for the domain
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries
  4. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response info found
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube
  8. No forms detected on the main page for data collection
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD) found in the HTML
  10. Website content is primarily in Lithuanian with language options for English and Russian
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Fancybox, and Swiper for UI components and interactivity. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are employed for user tracking and analytics. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident, and there is no structured data markup such as JSON-LD for enhanced SEO. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding accessibility features and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alpi.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alpi.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.