Skip to main content

Security report for alphalane.lv

AlphaLane · Transportation · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

34/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AlphaLane is a Latvian company specializing in auto leasing services for both individuals and businesses. Their website presents a professional image with clear service offerings including personal auto leasing, business fleet leasing, and insurance claim submission. The company targets the Latvian market and aims to provide convenient and cost-effective leasing solutions. The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins and themes, indicating a standard but effective technical infrastructure. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for user tracking, though privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly provided, which may affect compliance. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers, suggesting room for improvement in hardening the site against common web threats. Overall, the site is functional, safe, and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alphalane.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
34

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention alphalane.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for alphalane.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AlphaLane operates in the transportation sector, focusing on auto leasing services in Latvia. Their business model revolves around leasing vehicles to individuals and companies, providing tailored solutions for company fleets. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a local market focus. The company maintains clear contact information and a professional web presence but lacks visible certifications or advanced trust signals. The use of WordPress and common plugins suggests a cost-effective digital strategy. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies could be a compliance risk, especially under GDPR regulations applicable in Latvia.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The use of popular WordPress plugins requires regular updates to avoid known vulnerabilities. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML source, but the absence of security headers and privacy policies reduces the overall security maturity. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are not available, indicating potential gaps in compliance and security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  4. Consider publishing an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AlphaLane
Description
AlphaLane provides auto leasing services primarily targeting individuals and businesses in Latvia. They offer leasing solutions for personal cars and company fleets, emphasizing convenience and cost-effectiveness.
Key services
Auto leasing for individuals, Leasing solutions for company fleets, Insurance claim submission service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Slider Revolution, Visual Composer
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages detected.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  7. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
  9. No social media links found on the homepage.
  10. No visible certifications or security policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins such as Contact Form 7, Slider Revolution, and Visual Composer, indicating a standard content management approach. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and WordPress.org domains. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization detected. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO meta tags are minimal. The lack of advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alphalane.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alphalane.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.