Skip to main content

Security report for alliance22.nl

S.V. ALLIANCE '22 · Non-profit · Netherlands

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

S.V. ALLIANCE '22 is a well-established non-profit football club based in Haarlem-Zuid West, Netherlands, with a rich history dating back to 1922. The club serves a broad community audience including youth, senior, and veteran football players, and actively engages in community and volunteer activities. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, structured data, and active social media integration. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder, with modern technologies such as Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, though improvements can be made in privacy compliance by adding cookie consent and incident response information. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the club's community-oriented mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alliance22.nl

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates as a community sports organization focusing on football for various age groups and genders. Its business model is non-profit, relying on sponsorships and community involvement. The club has a strong local market position with a 100-year legacy, active volunteer programs, and partnerships with local organizations. The website supports these operations with detailed team information, news updates, and policies. The presence of multiple sponsors and community initiatives indicates a healthy partnership ecosystem and growth potential within the local sports sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and incident response contact details indicates gaps in full GDPR and security compliance. The site lacks a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from formalizing privacy and incident response practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and liabilities.
  3. Add incident response contact information or a dedicated security contact email.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
S.V. ALLIANCE '22
Description
Alliance ’22 is een bruisende buurtvereniging uit Haarlem-Zuid West, waar meiden en jongens voetballen, van de jongste jeugd en senioren t/m de veteranen en het trimvoetbal. De club is de sportieve thuisbasis van leden én een ontmoetingsplek in de wijk. We organiseren buurtactiviteiten, een buurtkamer en senioren sport, werken samen met kinderopvang en huiswerkbegeleiding én bieden werkplekken aan mensen die steuntje in de rug kunnen gebruiken. In 2022 vierde de club haar 100-jarig bestaan.
Key services
Football teams for various age groups and genders, Community activities and neighborhood engagement, Volunteer programs, Facilities for sports and social gatherings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established local football club with comprehensive content
  2. Good use of structured data and meta tags for SEO
  3. Active social media integration
  4. No visible security or privacy policy gaps except cookie consent mechanism
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  6. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS with strong SSL configuration. There is room for improvement in accessibility and cookie management. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting the club's digital needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alliance22.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alliance22.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.