Skip to main content

Security report for alleagroup.com

Allea Group · Real Estate · Cyprus

Partial score · DNS & email only

65/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Allea Group is a medium-sized real estate investment and development holding company based in Cyprus, specializing in exclusive European residential and commercial property projects. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence targeting investors and clients interested in high-end real estate opportunities. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with popular plugins and is hosted behind Cloudflare CDN, but critically lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS availability which severely impacts security posture. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating good privacy awareness. However, the absence of terms of service, security policy, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alleagroup.com

This scan found 7 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
90
Network security
100
Average
65

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an exclusive European property developer with a diversified portfolio, targeting investors seeking premium real estate assets. The business model focuses on investment and development holdings, leveraging a strong brand presence in Cyprus and Austria. The website content and structured data confirm clear contact channels and a consistent brand identity. The use of Cloudflare and integration of marketing tools like Cookiebot and WhatsApp chat indicate a moderate digital maturity. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found in the domain or content. The company maintains a moderate trust level with privacy compliance but lacks certifications or security policies publicly disclosed.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing visitors to potential data interception risks. While SPF and DMARC records are properly configured to protect email integrity, the absence of HTTPS and HSTS headers is a critical vulnerability. No security.txt or incident response contacts are provided, limiting the ability to report or respond to security incidents. The website does not implement advanced security headers or session management features. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration and enabling HTTPS is essential to improve security and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated versions.
  3. Implement HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce secure connections.
  4. Correct and properly configure CAA DNS records to restrict certificate issuance.
  5. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information for transparency.
  6. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  7. Enhance security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  8. Improve accessibility features and performance optimization for better user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.1 using WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, hosted on a PleskLin server behind Cloudflare CDN. It uses Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Cookiebot for consent management, and a WhatsApp chat plugin for customer interaction. The site employs caching and minification for CSS and JS but lacks performance metrics. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. SEO is enhanced with Rank Math plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards. However, the absence of HTTPS and modern TLS protocols is a major technical risk. The DNS setup includes valid SPF and DMARC records but malformed CAA records. Overall, the technical stack is modern but requires urgent security upgrades and performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alleagroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alleagroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.