Skip to main content

Security report for allacademy.com

ALL Academy International AB · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ALL Academy International AB operates as a specialized training development company focusing on human factors and resource management within the maritime industry. Their flagship Maritime Resource Management (MRM)™ program is recognized as an industry standard, serving a global audience including maritime universities, ship owners, and marine insurers. The company offers licensing, train-the-trainer courses, and online training events, positioning itself as a key player in maritime safety and efficiency training. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Salient theme and WPBakery page builder, with a moderate performance profile and good mobile optimization. However, analytics tools are installed but not fully configured, and accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site reflects a legitimate, small-sized maritime training business with consistent branding and moderate trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching allacademy.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as the provider of the Maritime Resource Management training standard, targeting maritime educational institutions and industry stakeholders worldwide. Their business model revolves around licensing training content and conducting instructor training events, including online courses. The presence of a partner portal (academywebportal.com) suggests a digital ecosystem supporting their training delivery. The company’s longevity since 2013 and global reach into 35 countries indicate stable growth and industry acceptance. Social media engagement and regular blog updates support ongoing community interaction and brand presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency and incident response readiness. The lack of configured analytics and cookie consent mechanisms indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, which is positive. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen web security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Configure or remove unused analytics plugins to avoid unnecessary data collection and potential privacy issues.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ALL Academy International AB
Description
ALL Academy International AB is an independent training development company primarily involved in human factors and resource management training programmes. ALL Academy is the company behind the Maritime Resource Management (MRM)™ training programme that has become the industry standard for resource management training. Primary users of MRM are maritime universities and training centres, ship owners, ship managers, manning agencies, pilot associations, marine insurers and P&I Clubs. The MRM network is the maritime industry’s largest network in the human factors area and MRM training is today available in 35 countries worldwide.
Key services
Maritime Resource Management (MRM) training, Train the trainer courses, Licensing MRM programmes, Online GRM Train the Trainer courses, Event proposals and training events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO, Salient Theme, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage or linked menus.
  3. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers are not explicitly listed on homepage.
  4. Social media presence includes Twitter and LinkedIn with official company links.
  5. Site uses WordPress with Salient theme and WPBakery page builder.
  6. Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, indicating incomplete analytics setup.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security headers detected.
  9. Content is focused on maritime resource management training and licensing.
  10. No visible advertising or tracking beyond basic Google Fonts and Font Awesome.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using a popular commercial theme (Salient) and WPBakery page builder, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances visual appeal but adds external dependencies. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for improvement in inclusive design. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for website and webpage. The site lacks advanced technical security controls and analytics configuration, which are areas for modernization and risk reduction.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with allacademy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review allacademy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.