Skip to main content

Security report for aljawadpike.com

Al-Jawad Pike · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Al-Jawad Pike is a London-based architectural practice specializing in architectural design and project development. The website presents a professional portfolio showcasing various projects, including award-winning and shortlisted works recognized by RIBA. The business appears to be a small-sized firm founded in 2014, with a clear focus on the real estate and architectural sector. The website is well-structured with good design quality and navigation, targeting a general audience interested in architectural services. From a technical perspective, the site uses jQuery 3.4.1 and custom JavaScript, hosted on a domain registered with PDR Ltd. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and Open Graph data, although accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate; the domain uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs), and domain transfer is protected. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected. There are no privacy or cookie policies, nor incident response or security policy disclosures, which limits compliance and trust. No contact information or forms are present, reducing direct user engagement and support options. Overall, the website is professional and credible but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and clearer contact channels to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching aljawadpike.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention aljawadpike.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for aljawadpike.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Al-Jawad Pike operates as a specialized architectural firm in London, focusing on high-quality architectural design projects. The firm has achieved recognition through RIBA awards and shortlisting, indicating a strong market position within the architectural sector. The business model centers on providing architectural services to clients likely in real estate development and related industries. The website targets architects, developers, and potential clients seeking architectural expertise. The firm appears to be small-sized with no public parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of contact details and social media presence suggests a boutique or invitation-only client approach. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website, and no direct revenue streams or e-commerce functionalities are present.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. The domain is registered with clientTransferProhibited status, reducing risk of unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended security enhancement. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small professional site but should be improved to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve user engagement and support.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and disclose security contact channels to improve transparency and preparedness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Al-Jawad Pike
Description
Al-Jawad Pike is London based architectural practice.
Key services
architectural design, project development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, custom JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfer

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and project showcase
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly listed
  4. No social media links detected
  5. No forms present on the homepage
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business profile
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technology stack primarily based on jQuery 3.4.1 and custom JavaScript. The HTML structure is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site preloads custom fonts and uses optimized images for project showcases. Hosting is via a registrar with DNS hosted on kualo.net nameservers. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy frameworks or CMS detected. Mobile optimization is good with viewport meta tags and responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected in the provided HTML snippet. SEO is supported by canonical links and descriptive metadata. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking tools, which limits data-driven insights but enhances privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with aljawadpike.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review aljawadpike.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.