Skip to main content

Security report for alepakorttelitoive.fi

Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta · Retail · Finland

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website alepakorttelitoive.fi serves as a customer engagement platform for Alepa stores in Finland, allowing customers to submit product or service wishes to tailor local store assortments. The site is operated by Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta, a large Finnish retail cooperative group, which aligns with the domain registration data and business focus. The platform is designed with modern web technologies including Next.js and integrates privacy and cookie consent management via Usercentrics, alongside Google Tag Manager for analytics. From a technical perspective, the site demonstrates a moderate to good level of digital maturity with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, inferred from DNS nameservers. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policy disclosures. The site uses HTTPS and secure form inputs, with a clear data retention policy for phone numbers collected via the form. Security posture is generally sound with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed through linked comprehensive privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting GDPR adherence. The absence of direct company contact emails is noted, but the presence of a contact form and optional phone number input with automatic deletion supports privacy best practices. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, with a strong alignment between WHOIS data and business identity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and expanding contact information transparency to further improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alepakorttelitoive.fi

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Alepa Korttelitoive operates within the Finnish retail sector as a customer feedback and engagement tool, enabling localized product assortment customization. The business model leverages direct customer input to enhance store offerings, strengthening customer loyalty and competitive differentiation. The parent company, Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta, is a large cooperative retail group, providing strong market presence and operational scale. The platform's integration with privacy and analytics tools indicates a mature approach to digital marketing and compliance. Growth potential lies in expanding customer engagement features and integrating with broader retail analytics. Partnerships appear limited to internal group domains, maintaining focused brand coherence.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate to good, with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of common security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests potential risk areas. Compliance with GDPR is supported by clear privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms, but no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found. The site would benefit from formalizing security documentation and enhancing header configurations to mitigate common web threats. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity but requires incremental improvements for higher assurance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance contact information transparency by providing verified company contact emails for security and support inquiries.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy incorporating continuous monitoring, employee training, and compliance audits.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta
Registration number
0116323-1
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunta
Description
A platform for customers to submit product or service wishes for their local Alepa store, enabling store-specific assortment customization.
Key services
Customer product/service wish submission, Store-specific assortment customization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form inputs
  • No exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. The site uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked to a reputable parent company site.
  4. No direct company contact emails found; phone number input is optional and transient.
  5. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  6. The site collects user input via forms with clear data retention policies for phone numbers.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content; potential area for improvement.
  8. The site is focused on customer engagement for retail product wishes in Alepa stores.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, indicating a contemporary technology stack. Hosting is likely on AWS infrastructure, supported by AWS DNS nameservers. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks and uses Usercentrics for consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and CSS preloading. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags present. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Technical risks include missing security headers and reliance on third-party scripts which require ongoing management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alepakorttelitoive.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alepakorttelitoive.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.