Skip to main content

Security report for alejasmaize.lv

Pričina G., individuālā darba veicēja · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Alejas maizes ceptuve is a small artisanal bakery business based in Latvia, specializing in wood-fired natural sourdough bread and confectionery products. Founded in 2013 by Gunita Pričina and family, the business serves local and regional customers through direct sales, markets, and workshops. The website reflects a well-maintained digital presence with clear business information, social media integration, and customer engagement features. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, and service workers for PWA capabilities, hosted on a CDN platform. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and use of CAPTCHA on contact forms, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-suited for its business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching alejasmaize.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on artisanal bakery products with a strong local market presence. Its competitive advantage lies in traditional baking methods and personalized customer experiences such as workshops. Revenue streams include direct sales at markets, home deliveries, and event-based services. The company maintains active social media channels and partnerships with local markets and tourism sites, indicating a community-oriented approach. Growth potential exists through expanded digital marketing and enhanced e-commerce capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and CAPTCHA protection on forms. However, the absence of comprehensive security headers and privacy controls indicates room for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which may limit transparency. GDPR compliance is partial due to missing cookie consent. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but should be enhanced to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Add and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and analytics scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Pričina G., individuālā darba veicēja
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Pričina G., individuālā darba veicēja
Description
"Aleju" saimniecībā maizīti cepam no dabīgā ierauga malkas krāsnī. Piedāvājumā mājās ceptas picas un maizes ar dažādām piedevām - sēklām, augļiem, kaņepēm, gaļu. Gaidam ciemos tuvus un tālus viesus!
Key services
wood-fired natural sourdough bread, home-baked pizzas, custom orders for bakery products, workshops and excursions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Snowplow Analytics, Google Maps Embed, Service Worker for PWA, CSS3, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of reCAPTCHA in contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow Analytics
Marketing tools
Snowplow
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and images.
  2. Business is a small artisanal bakery in Latvia with local presence.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  4. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Google My Business, and Waze.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Site uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform (Multiscreensite) with a modern tech stack including jQuery 3.7.0, Google Analytics, and Snowplow for analytics, and uses service workers for progressive web app features. Hosting is via a CDN provider ensuring reasonable performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. Some technical debt is noted in missing security headers and lack of cookie consent. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with alejasmaize.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review alejasmaize.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.